مدلسازی تاثیر توسعه شایستگی جهانی بر شکل گیری شهروندان جهانی در آموزش عالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کمی )

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان ، زاهدان، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

چکیده
هدف پژوهش، مدلسازی تاثیر توسعه شایستگی بر شکل‌گیری شهروندان جهانی در سیستم آموزش عالی بوده است. این پژوهش به روش همبستگی در جامعه دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان با نمونه 317 نفری بر اساس تصادفی طبقه‌ای اجرا شده است. ابزار پژوهش دو پرسشنامه شهروند جهانی و توسعه شایستگی جهانی بوده است. روایی و پایایی هر دو ابزار مطابق با یافته های تحقیق مناسب گزارش شد. روش تجزیه و تحلیل از طریق نرم افزار لیزرل، مدل معادلات ساختاری بوده است. نتایج نشان داد، توسعه شایستگی جهانی بر مسئولیت اجتماعی، صلاحیت جهانی و مشارکت مدنی جهانی اثر مستقیم دارد از طرفی توسعه شایستگی به بر مشارکت مدنی جهانی از طریق صلاحیت جهانی و مسئولیت اجتماعی اثر غیرمستقیم داشت همچنین صلاحیت جهانی و مسئولیت اجتماعی اثر مستقیم بر مشارکت مدنی جهانی داشته‌اند. می توان گفت ابزراهای کلیدی شهروند جهانی همچون مسئولیت اجتماعی، صلاحیت اجتماعی و مشارکت مدنی تحت تاثیر توسعه شایستگی جهانی در سیستم اموزش عالی می‌باشد به بیان دیگر توسعه دانش، مهارت و نگرش بر شکل گیری شهروندان جهانی نقش ویژه دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Modeling the effect of competence development on the formation of global citizens in the higher education

نویسندگان English

kosar khajedad 1
kamran bagherimajd 2
1 MA of Educational administration, Depart,ment of educational sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of educational sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract
The aim of this research was to model the effect of the competence development on the formation of global citizens in the higher education system. This correlational study was conducted on a sample of 317 postgraduate students at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan, selected through stratified random sampling. The research instruments were the Global Citizen and Global Competence Development questionnaires, both of which were found to have acceptable validity and reliability. The data were analyzed using the structural equation modeling method in LISREL software. The results showed that the global competence development has a direct effect on social responsibility, global competence, and global civic engagement. Additionally, the global competence development had an indirect effect on global civic engagement through global competence and social responsibility. Furthermore, global competence and social responsibility had a direct effect on global civic engagement. It can be said that the key components of global citizenship, such as social responsibility, global competence, and global civic engagement, are influenced by the global competence development in the higher education system. In other words, the knowledge development, skills, and attitudes play a significant role in the formation of global citizens.
Introduction
Due to the diversity of the social system and the difference between Iran and its neighboring countries in terms of ethnicity, race, language, and religious and political aspects, as well as the lack of awareness about the social role of systems and the lack of sufficient information about social life, councils, the geographical characteristics of Iran's neighboring countries, environmental pollution, and the services of Islamic civilization; the formation of global citizens has been faced with challenges. On the other hand, the formation of global citizens can facilitate increasing understanding and peace in the Middle East by focusing on the commonalities of humans rather than exaggerating ethnic, linguistic, racial, cultural, religious, and political differences. Therefore, by considering the concepts of democracy, human rights, citizenship rights, global responsibility, equality, peace and empathy among students, higher education systems can accelerate and facilitate the formation of global citizens and the development of sustainability in society (Rezaee et al., 2022). It can be said that with the spread of social and economic gaps, climate change, terrorism, migration, pandemics, the occurrence of wars and conflicts, the weakening of democratic institutions and processes, and widespread and emerging changes in the economy, technology and culture, globalization; how can the higher education system respond to these changing realities and the complex, chaotic and uncertain future? Now is a very important time for the higher education community to emphasize the goal, vision and scope of developing global competence for the formation of global citizens. The global competence development to develop the knowledge, skills and attitudes in creating social, civic and citizenship competence for flexible adaptation to the changing world of today is a necessity. Limited studies in the field of examining the factors affecting competence development in higher education institutions and the likelihood of not paying attention to the factors affecting the formation of global citizens and their components have led researchers to raise this research question: to what extent is the development of global competence effective on the components of the global citizen?
Theoretical Framework
Global Citizen: A citizen is someone whose behaviors are in accordance with the structure of civil society by internalizing the values of that society. Today, the continuation of the life, progress and development of societies depends on the existence of active, participatory, aware and engaged citizens (Lombardo, 2015). There are two main approaches to global citizenship; one being the overt approach of global competence goals aimed at providing individuals with the necessary skills to compete in the global society, and the other being the global awareness approach which aims to provide individuals with a global orientation, empathy and cultural sensitivity rooted in human assumptions and values (Dill, 2013). Studies perceive the dimensions of global citizenship as a multidimensional structure, and accordingly, the dimensions of global citizenship are considered in three areas of social responsibility, global competence, and civic engagement (Morais et al., 2011).
Global Competence Development: Global competence refers to the capacity and willingness to thrive in this world; and the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values required for advancement in an interconnected world. Global competence has dimensions for examining issues of local, global and cultural significance, understanding and appreciating the perspectives and worldviews of others, the skill of engaging in open, appropriate and effective intercultural interactions, and acting for collective well-being and sustainable development (Jang et al., 2023; Giannina, 2020). Studies have focused on the dimensions of competence development in terms of knowledge and understanding, skills, and attitudes and values (Liu et al., 2020).
Research methodology
The present research method was a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population was approximately 3,000 postgraduate students at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Using stratified random sampling (in three groups of humanities, engineering and related sciences, and basic and related sciences), 384 students were selected according to the Morgan table, and 317 questionnaires were returned. The research instruments were two questionnaires: the Global Citizen Formation and Global Competence Development questionnaires. The Global Citizen Formation questionnaire was adapted from the Morais and Ogden (2011) model, which had three sections: social responsibility, global citizenship competence, and global civic engagement. The social responsibility section included 13 items and 3 sub-components: justice and equality, altruism and empathy, and global connectedness and personal responsibility. The global citizenship competence section included 13 items and 3 sub-components: self-awareness, intercultural communication, and global knowledge. The global civic engagement section included 15 items and 3 sub-components: participation in civil organizations, political discourse, and global civic activity. The Global Competence Development questionnaire was adapted from the Liu et al. (2020) model, which included 10 items on knowledge and understanding, 14 items on skills, and 11 items on attitudes and values. The data analysis method was structural equation modeling using the LISREL software.
Research Findings
The results showed that the direct effect of competence development on the fulfillment of global competence (0.61), social responsibility (0.58), and civic engagement (0.32) were significant at the 0.005 level. The effect of the fulfillment of social responsibility on the formation of civic engagement (0.38) and the effect of the fulfillment of global competence on civic engagement (0.34) were also significant at the 0.001 level.
Conclusion
According to the findings, it can be said that universities are the most important place for citizenship education and are also a suitable place for the formation of global citizens. If students study in a university with global competence, they can form appropriate global citizens for a society by acquiring knowledge, skills, and attitudes. By acquiring competence, responsibility, and civic engagement, students and graduates will play a role in shaping a sustainable global society, and in this sustainable society, with increased understanding, mutual understanding and respect, they will contribute to the sharing of international benefits. Universities play a role in increasing global awareness through education and student participation, improving interactions, developing communications, and strengthening adaptability in the community; which will lead to increased self-confidence, understanding, and respect for people from different cultures. Higher education institutions are constructive in the formation of a sustainable global society through the creation of critical thinking skills, motivation for participation, global activities, empathy, attention to justice and gender equality, and strengthening the responsibility of students. On the other hand, the global competence development through the improvement of knowledge and understanding, strengthening skills, and reforming the attitudes of students is one of the most important goals of the higher education system. In other words, competent students can use the acquired knowledge, skills, and attitudes to interact and communicate with others, and be constructive through direct and indirect relationships in universities in improving their own competence. Therefore, equal opportunities and the implementation of justice in education among students at the university are constructive in improving global competence; and by changing old and traditional teaching methods and creating educational innovations, higher education institutions can take a big step towards improving knowledge, skills, and attitudes. From another perspective, it can be stated that the global competence development of citizens is more influenced by intercultural communications than by local government policies, and the important factors of global competence are often overlooked or minimized in educational systems, which will have consequences for education and the global competence development (Sakamoto, 2022).

کلیدواژه‌ها English

global competence development
global citizens
students
higher education system
Azizi, L., & Sassen, R. (2023). How universities' social responsibility activities influence students’ perceptions of reputation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 137963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137963.
Assis, N., Reysen, S., Gibson, S., & Hendricks, L. (2018). Perception of university responsibility and global citizenship identification. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 8(2), 19-30.
AwayedBishara, M. (2021). Linguistic citizenship in the EFL classroom: Granting the local a voice through English. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 743-765. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3009.
Bardi, U., & Pereira, C. A. (Eds.). (2022). Limits and Beyond: 50 Years on from The Limits to Growth, what Did We Learn and What's Next?: a Report to the Club of Rome. Exapt Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad085.
Bennett, L. B., Aguayo, R. C., & Field, S. L. (2016). At home in the world: Supporting children in human rights, global citizenship, and digital citizenship. Childhood Education, 92(3), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2016.1180892.
Carabain, C., Keulemans, S., van Gent, M., & Spitz, G. (2012). Mondiaal burgerschap: Van draagvlak naar actieve participatie. Avable from: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/50554/.
Castilla-Polo, F., Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., & Ruiz-Rodríguez, M. C. (2023). Best practice learning in cooperative entrepreneurship to engage business students in the SDGs. Studies in Higher Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2266468.
Crawford, E. O., Higgins, H. J., & Hilburn, J. (2020). Using a global competence model in an instructional design course before social studies methods: A developmental approach to global teacher education. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.04.002.
D’Adamo, I., & Gastaldi, M. (2023). Perspectives and Challenges on sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications in universities. Sustainability, 15(4), 3564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043564.
de la Torre, J. R., & Young, C. B. (2020). Global citizenship and business education, part 2: The role of business schools. AIB Insights, 20(1), 1-6. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d041/1de107f7b8b2ad56d0c108a8e062316960cf.pdf.
Dill, J. S. (2013). The longings and limits of global citizenship education: The moral pedagogy of schooling in a cosmopolitan age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.877621.
Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C. O., Samsurijan, M. S., Radin Firdaus, R. B., & Rohayati, M. I. (2023). Expanded corporate social responsibility framework: companies’ role in improving higher education institutions infrastructure to Sustainable Development Goal 4. Journal of Facilities Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-11-2022-0120.
Ferraris, A., Devalle, A., Ciampi, F., & Couturier, J. (2019). Are global R&D partnerships enough to increase a company's innovation performance? The role of search and integrative capacities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, 119750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119750.
Giannina, R. E. C. H. (2020). PISA PISA 2018 Results (Volume VI): Are students ready to thrive in an interconnected world? Available from: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3839702/pisa-pisa-2018-results-volume-vi/4645594/.
Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2023). Pedagogical practices and civic knowledge and engagement in Latin America: Multilevel analysis using ICCS data. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21319.
Goren, H., & Yemini, M. (2017). Global citizenship education redefined–A systematic review of empirical studies on global citizenship education. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.004.
Han, H., Park, S. C., Kim, J., Jeong, C., Kunii, Y., & Kim, S. (2018). A quantitative analysis of moral exemplars presented in moral education textbooks in Korea and Japan. Asia Pacific journal of education, 38(1), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1423950.
Jang, G., Schwarzenthal, M., & Juang, L. P. (2023). Adolescents’ global competence: A latent profile analysis and exploration of student-, parent-, and school-related predictors of profile membership. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92, 101729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.10.005.
Jang, S., & Ardichvili, A. (2020). Examining the link between corporate social responsibility and human resources: Implications for HRD research and practice. Human Resource Development Review, 19(2), 183-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320912044.
Kang, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Jang, S., & Koh, A. R. (2018). Can college students’ global competence be enhanced in the classroom? The impact of cross-and inter-cultural online projects. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(6), 683-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1294987.
Kidson, P., Odhiambo, G., & Wilson, R. (2019). The International Baccalaureate in Australia: trends and issues. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(3), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508489709556294.
LaSha Bradley, D. (2012). Incorporating Concepts of Global Citizenry into Student-Centered Academic Advising. In Transforming Learning Environments: Strategies to Shape the Next Generation (pp. 65-79). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3660(2012)0000016007.
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., ... & Caeiro, S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309.
LeCompte, K., Blevins, B., & Riggers-Piehl, T. (2020). Developing civic competence through action civics: A longitudinal look at the data. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.03.002.
Leeman, Y., Nieveen, N., de Beer, F., & Van der Steen, J. (2020). Teachers as curriculummakers: the case of citizenship education in Dutch schools. The Curriculum Journal, 31(3), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.21.
Levin, I., & Mamlok, D. (2021). Culture and society in the digital age. Information, 12(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020068.
Li, Y. (2013). Cultivating student global competence: A pilot experimental study. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 11(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00371.x.
Li, X., He, E., & Zhao, X. (2024). An empirical study of the effects of social-emotional competence on Chinese college students' interpersonal relationship circles from a relational theory perspective. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 47, 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100824.
Liu, Y., Yin, Y., & Wu, R. (2020). Measuring graduate students’ global competence: Instrument development and an empirical study with a Chinese sample. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100915.
Lombardo, T. J. (2015). Making urban citizens: Civility and civic virtue in the modern metropolis. 41(1), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144214551722.
MacKenzie, A., Enslin, P., & Hedge, N. (2016). Education for global citizenship in Scotland: Reciprocal partnership or politics of benevolence?. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.007.
Manolis, E. N., & Manoli, E. N. (2021). Raising awareness of the sustainable development goals through ecological projects in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123614.
Morais, D. B., & Ogden, A. C. (2011). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale. Journal of studies in international education, 15(5), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310375308.
OECD., K. (2018). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2018. Paris: OECD publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-en.
Osagie, E. R., Wesselink, R., Runhaar, P., & Mulder, M. (2018). Unraveling the competence development of corporate social responsibility leaders: The importance of peer learning, learning goal orientation, and learning climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 891-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3638-8.
Parthasarathy, B., Dey, S., & Gupta, P. (2021). Overcoming wicked problems and institutional voids for social innovation: University-NGO partnerships in the Global South. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121104.
Pinto, S. (2018). Intercultural competence in higher education: academics’ perspectives. On the Horizon, 26(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-02-2018-0011.
Popov, V., Brinkman, D., & van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2017). Becoming globally competent through student mobility. Competence-based vocational and professional education: Bridging the worlds of work and education, 1007-1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_47.
Rahimi Kalor, H, Ghasemi Hamdani, I, & Ebrahimi Kharajo, V. (2023). Analyzing the moderating role of participatory management in the relationship between the dark triangle of personality and organizational citizenship behavior of Mohaghegh Ardabili University employees. Education management and perspective quarterly. 5(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmep.2023.390158.1175. (in Persian)
Rasouli, M., Tari, G., & Baghaei, H. (2024). Antecedents and consequences of professional competence of school administrators with emphasis on environmental sustainability and sustainable development. Education management and perspective quarterly. 6(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmep.2024.449993.1344. (in Persian)
Reiche, B. S., Bird, A., Mendenhall, M. E., & Osland, J. (2015). The conceptual basis for a global leadership typology. In Academy of Management Meeting. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.10907abstract.
Rezaee, A., Saadatmand, Z., & Rahmani, J. (2022). Perspectives and Challenges of Global Citizenship Education in the Iran Primary School Curriculum: Analysis Based on an Islamic Republic Context. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 5(1), 1789-1812. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijce.2022.304306.1348. (in Persian)
Ruiz-Jimenez, M. C., Martinez-Jimenez, R., Liceran-Gutierrez, A., & Garcia-Marti, E. (2022). Students’ attitude: Key to understanding the improvement of their academic RESULTS in a flipped classroom environment. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100635.
Sakamoto, F. (2022). Global competence in Japan: What do students really need?. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 91, 216-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.10.006.
Sasaki, T., & Horng, C. Y. (2023). Exploratory study about achievements and issues of university social responsibility—“USR” as a dynamic process. International Journal of Educational Development, 102, 102869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102869.
Saud, M., Ida, R., Mashud, M., Yousaf, F. N., & Ashfaq, A. (2023). Cultural dynamics of digital space: Democracy, civic engagement and youth participation in virtual spheres. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 97, 101904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101904.
Sun, L. (2023). Pedagogies of discomfort and empathy in foreign language education: Fostering EFL learners' critical global thinking through literature and art. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101411.
Tarman, B., & Kilinc, E. (2023). Predicting high school students’ global civic engagement: A multiple regression analysis. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 47(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.02.001.
Tye, K. A. (2014). Global education: A worldwide movement. An update. Policy Futures in Education, 12(7), 855-871. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.7.855.
Udvari, B., & Vizi, N. (2023). Employing the flipped classroom to raise the global citizenship competences of economics students to a global issue. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100736.
 Van Rompay-Bartels, I., & Tuninga, R. S. (2023). Toward a model of global citizenship in business education. Journal of Transnational Management, 28(1-2), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2023.2223096.
Walsh, G., & Bartikowski, B. (2013). Exploring corporate ability and social responsibility associations as antecedents of customer satisfaction cross-culturally. Journal of business research, 66(8), 989-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.022.
Wang, X., Young, G. W., Plechatá, A., Mc Guckin, C., & Makransky, G. (2023). Utilizing virtual reality to assist social competence education and social support for children from under-represented backgrounds. Computers & Education, 201, 104815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104815.
Wu, X. (2023). Fostering Chinese preservice teachers’ global competence through inquiry learning in glocalised educational contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103961.
Wu, X., & Tarc, P. (2021). Chinese international students in a Canadian private secondary school: becoming flexible citizens?. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(6), 901-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1684242.
Yemini, M., Goren, H., & Maxwell, C. (2018). Global citizenship education in the era of mobility, conflict and globalisation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(4), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1533103.
Zakariya, Y. F. (2021). Undergraduate students’ performance in mathematics: Individual and combined effects of approaches to learning, self-efficacy, and prior mathematics knowledge. University of Agder. Available from: https://uia.brage.unit.no/uia-xmlui/handle/11250/2737867.
ZHAO, X., YU, E., & ZHANG, S. (2018). Intercultural Competence in Higher Education. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Éducative, 51(3), 261-280. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26873073.

  • تاریخ دریافت 20 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 30 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 18 مرداد 1403