توانمندی سازمانی مبتنی بر بستر تغییرات راهبردی در سازمان فنی و حرفه‌ای کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کیفی )

نویسندگان

1 استاد بخش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، مؤسسه آموزش عالی مهر اروند، آبادان، ایران

3 دانش‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

چکیده
هدف کلی از انجام این پژوهش کشف و ارائه چارچوبی برای توانمندی سازمانی در بستر تغییرات راهبردی با تأکید بر قلمرو سازمان فنی و حرفه ای کشور بود. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، توسعه ای با رویکرد کیفی و روش پژوهش، مطالعه موردی بود. مشارکت کنندگان پژوهش، 15 نفر از متخصصان رهبری و تغییر در سیستم های آموزشی به ویژه سیستم آموزش های فنی و حرفه ای بودند که با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند از نوع معیار، با در نظر گرفتن بحث اشباع نظری انتخاب شدند. گردآوری داده ها از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته انجام گردید. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با روش تحلیل مضمون و با استفاده از نرم افزار MAXQDA 2020 انجام شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که چارچوب توانمندی سازمانی متشکل از چهار بعد (انسجام، اثربخشی، پاسخگویی و تصویر بیرونی مطلوب) بوده که هریک از این ابعاد مشتمل بر مؤلفه های مرتبط می باشند. جهت اعتبارپذیری داده ها، از نظرات برخی از مشارکت کنندگان و همچنین متخصصان رشته مدیریت آموزشی و آموزش عالی و برای انتقال پذیری یافته ها نیز، از روش بازآزمایی بهره گرفته شد. بر این اساس ضریب پایایی، معادل 87/0 به دست آمد که بیانگر آن است که پژوهش از قابلیت اعتماد بالایی برخوردار بوده است. نتایج پژوهش می تواند به عنوان راهنمای عمل مدیران سیستم های آموزشی در عرصه نظری و عملیاتی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Organizational capability based on the context of strategic changes in the country's technical and professional organization

نویسندگان English

Jafar Torkzadeh 1
Gholamreza Momeni 2
Zahra Pakbaz 3
1 1. Professor, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, MehrArvand institute of Higher Education, Abadan, Iran
3 3. Ph.D. in Educational Administration, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده English

The overall objective of this research was to discover and present a framework for organizational capability in the context of strategic changes with an emphasis on the territory of the technical and vocational organization of the country. This research was a development with a qualitative approach and a case study research method in terms of its purpose. The research participants were 15 experts in leadership and change in educational systems, especially the technical and vocational education system, selected using a purposive sampling method of the criterion type, taking into account the theoretical saturation issue. Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was carried out using the content analysis method and using MAXQDA 2020 software. The results of the research showed that the organizational capability framework consisted of four dimensions (coherence, effectiveness, responsiveness, and desirable external image), each of which includes related components. In order to validate the data, the opinions of some participants as well as experts in the field of educational management and higher education were used, and for the transferability of the findings, the test-retest method was used. Accordingly, the reliability coefficient was obtained as 0.87, which indicates that the research had high reliability. The results of the research can be used as a guide for the actions of educational system managers in the theoretical and operational fields.
Introduction
Complicated and rapid environmental changes force organizations to continuously redefine their internal capacities for survival, growth, and competition, or, in other words, to empower their pillars and structure in the face of strategic changes. Therefore, organizational capability is considered one of the key factors for success in complex and changing conditions of the strategic environment. These capabilities include a set of competencies, abilities, and resources that enable organizations to exploit opportunities arising from environmental changes, manage threats, and achieve sustainable competitive advantage (Martínez-Peláez et al., 2023). Organizational capabilities, based on a set of skills, resources, and processes, are considered to be the basis for developing strategic tools to adapt to environmental changes and exploit emerging opportunities (Rengkung, 2022). These capabilities help the organization not only manage changes, but also use them as a driver for innovation and an opportunity for growth (Barney et al., 2024). In fact, organizational capability, as one of the most important factors for the success of organizations in facing environmental challenges, refers to the ability of the organization to identify, maintain and exploit its resources and capabilities to achieve strategic goals (Teece et al., 2016). Therefore, organizations with high capability can quickly adapt to changes, produce high-quality products and create competitive advantages (Pratono, 2024). Research shows that organizational capabilities are becoming more important in the face of strategic changes. Organizations that have the ability to create coordination between human resources, new technologies and organizational strategies can better adapt to changing conditions and show higher performance (Zhang & Chen, 2024). Strategic changes within and outside the organization, as a necessity in today's business environment, require a deep understanding of the dimensions and components of organizational capability. These changes can include changes in organizational structure, culture, technology, or macro strategies (Henry, 2021). In this regard, identifying and strengthening the dimensions of organizational capability can help organizations successfully implement these changes. Organizational capability is a multidimensional and fruitful area that can be examined from various aspects, especially in educational and skill-based organizations. Paying attention to the topic of organizational capability in educational organizations is significant because, according to Badami, Jahanian & Mohammadi Nezhad Gangi (2025), paying attention to the quality of performance, excellence, and organizational capability in educational organizations is of particular importance due to their mission in training specialized human resources for society. Accordingly, the present study aims to identify the dimensions and components of organizational capability in the context of strategic changes and seeks to answer the question: what dimensions and components explain the organizational capability of the country's technical and vocational organization in the face of strategic changes?
Theoretical Framework
Organizational Capability
Organizational capability, as one of the key concepts in strategic management, has attracted the attention of many researchers and managers in recent decades. This concept refers to a set of capabilities, knowledge, skills, processes, and resources that enable organizations to sustainably achieve competitive advantage and adapt in the face of environmental changes (Rengkung, 2022). These capabilities include technical, human, and structural aspects and directly affect the performance of the organization (Abdurrahman et al., 2024). According to Barney et al. (1991), organizational capabilities include areas such as innovation, organizational learning, human resources, and leadership that can help organizations respond appropriately to environmental changes and enhance their strategic successes (Ferreira et al., 2021).
Various dimensions of organizational capability have been considered, such as the ability to learn, the ability to create and apply new knowledge in order to develop innovation in processes and products, flexibility, strategic agility based on the speed of response to changes, knowledge management, and the power of external cooperation (Gomes et al., 2022). In a general view, organizational capability can be assessed in the quantity and quality of three major assets in the organization; human capital, including the knowledge, skills, and abilities of employees, which are vital for increasing performance and advancing innovation in the organization (Liu et al., 2020).
Research Methodology
This research was a development with a qualitative approach and a case study in terms of purpose. The research participants (key informants) were 15 experts in leadership and change in educational systems, especially the technical and vocational education system, selected using a purposive sampling method of the criterion type, taking into account the theoretical saturation issue. Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was carried out using thematic analysis method and MAXQDA 2020 software.
Research findings
In order to discover the framework of organizational capability in the context of strategic changes with an emphasis on the country's technical and vocational organization, interviews were conducted with experts and experienced in management, leadership and change in educational systems, especially skill organizations and people who, in addition to scientific abilities, had direct and indirect management experiences at the middle and senior levels of the country's technical and vocational education organization in the organization of the research area. While analyzing the interview text in detail, 20 related basic themes were identified and by categorizing similar basic themes in one category, 4 organizing themes were drawn, and finally a network of themes was drawn. The results of the study showed that the organizational capability framework in the context of strategic changes consisted of four dimensions: effectiveness, responsiveness, coherence, and desirable external image, each of which included related components. The effectiveness dimension included the components of internal effectiveness, external effectiveness, institutional effectiveness, effective activities, and correct performance of tasks. The responsiveness dimension included the components of responsiveness to the environment, responsiveness to internal conditions and needs, social responsibility, and attention to environmental conditions and needs. The coherence dimension included the components of conceptual coherence, operational coherence, social coherence, structural coherence, spiritual coherence, and emotional coherence. The desirable external image dimension included the components of environmental desirability, positive environmental evaluation, external acceptability, internal acceptability, and positive performance evaluation.
Conclusion
The results of the present study show that organizational capability in the field of technical and vocational education organization as a skill-oriented institution that trains specialized human resources and technology for society includes multiple dimensions of coherence, effectiveness, responsiveness, and a desirable external image. The dimensions affecting organizational capability are, in a way, the fulcrum of the technical and vocational organization as an open system so that it can achieve competitive advantage in dynamic and challenging environments in addition to maintaining meaningful survival. These dimensions jointly increase the organization's capacity to deal with strategic changes and achieve long-term goals. Various aspects of effectiveness, both internal in the sense of the quality of task performance and external in the sense of effective responsiveness to the environment, and then institutional effectiveness in the sense of realizing the organization's mission and desirability in the environment, are vital components of organizational capability. The findings of this study are in line with the results of studies by Brinia (2022); Zacharias (2021) confirms that organizational effectiveness is one of the key indicators of success in strategic change. Environmental responsiveness, which includes social responsibility and providing services that meet the needs of the environment, is another key theme identified in this study. This theme is consistent with El Idrissi et al.'s (2023) theories about latent capabilities, which show that an organization's responsiveness to the environment often results from latent capabilities that are activated in times of crisis. The various components of organizational cohesion resulting from the findings of the present study in the field of technical and vocational education show that desirable and optimal cohesion is achieved when the various elements of the organization, including human resources, physical resources, structure and processes, are compatible and coordinated with each other, and cohesion is objectively manifested both in conceptual and cognitive aspects and in operational aspects and professional relationships throughout the organization's structure. The final component of organizational capability, which is both a result of capability and an important factor in creating organizational capability, is the desired external image of the organization. Existing systems in the environment refer only to an organization that trusts it and has a suitable image of it. Therefore, the image that organizations leave in the environment with their health and output is very important and leads to organizational capability. However, the important point is that the coordination and alignment of the four main dimensions of organizational capability, namely coherence, effectiveness, responsiveness, and external image, requires attention to a key and important element called organizational leadership. Leadership, by creating a link between the system and its current and future environment and considering systemic requirements, can provide the correct arrangement of components together in a way that leads to improved coherence, effectiveness, and responsiveness of the system to the environment, and as a result, improved the external image of the organization in the environment, and taking advantage of the feedback effects of this important factor in strengthening and improving the level of the aforementioned three variables. Accordingly, it can be stated that effective leadership, by helping to improve the accountability, effectiveness, and coherence of the organization, along with the desired image they portray of the organization, provides the organization's capabilities inside and outside the organization.
The findings of the present study confirm that the country's technical and vocational education organization can achieve capabilities when it is able to develop indicators based on coherence, effectiveness, accountability, and external image, and gain the power to interact effectively with the strategic and changing environment more than other competitors. The organization's capabilities lead to an intelligent understanding of the needs and requirements of the present and future environment, and this awareness leads to the design of efficient strategies to respond appropriately and timely to these requirements.

Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge all individuals, institutions, and organizations that provided scientific, technical, administrative, or advisory support throughout this research and the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial, personal, professional, or institutional conflicts of interest relevant to this work.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
AI Use Statement
The authors declare that no generative artificial intelligence (AI) or AI-assisted technologies were used in the preparation, writing, or editing of this manuscript.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other financial support were received during the conduct of this research or the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics Approval
All procedures performed in this study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible institutional and national research committee.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Strategic change
Organizational capability
Strategic leadership
Change management
Technical and professional
Abdurrahman, A., Gustomo, A., & Prasetio, E. A. (2024). Impact of dynamic capabilities on digital transformation and innovation to improve banking performance: A TOE framework study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100215. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100215]
Ahmed, F., Naqshbandi, M. M., Waheed, M., & Ain, N. U. (2024). Digital leadership and innovative work behavior: impact of LMX, learning orientation and innovation capabilities. Management Decision, 62 (11): 3607–3632. [https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2023-0654]
Ahmad, B., Shafique, I., Qammar, A., Ercek, M., & Kalyar, M. N. (2024). Prompting green product and process innovation: examining the effects of green transformational leadership and dynamic capabilities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(6), 1-13. [DOI:10.1080/09537325.2022.2071692]
Ali, R. Q., & Lafta, B. S. (2024). The relationship between the dimensions of the strategic cohesion and achieving the organizational prosperity: Applied research in the National Insurance Company. Journal of Accounting and Financial Studies (JAFS), 19(66), 176-188. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.34093/873qs943]
Amalia, M. R. (2024). The Impact of Digital Era 4.0 Transformation on Human Resources Management. Management Studies and Business Journal (PRODUCTIVITY), 1(1), 89-98. [DOI:10.62207/9btfqx28]
Atobishi, T., Moh’d Abu Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024). How Do Digital Capabilities Affect Organizational Performance in the Public Sector? The Mediating Role of the Organizational Agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 37. [https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020037]
Badami, M., Jahanian, R. and Mohammadi Nezhad Gangi, A. (2025). Designing a Visionary Leadership Model Based on Organizational Excellence in the Educational System. Management and Educational Perspective, 7(2), 1-20. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2025.490870.1444 (In Persian)
Bagga, S. K., Gera, S., & Haque, S. N. (2023). The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 120-131. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.003]
Baima, G., Forliano, C., Santoro, G., & Vrontis, D. (2021). Intellectual capital and business model: a systematic literature review to explore their linkages. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(3), 653-679. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0055]
Barbosa, M. T., & Carvalho, M. M. (2024). Absorptive capacity activation triggers: Insights from learning in project epochs of a project-basd organization. International Journal of Project Management, 42(6), 102637. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102637]
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. [https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108]
Barney, J. B., Kivleniece, I., & McGahan, A. M. (2024). Theories of firms and the emergence of multinational enterprises: the organizational and managerial implications of solving transactional problems versus creating exchange value. Journal of International Business Studies, 56(1), 23-32. [DOI:10.1057/s41267-024-00759-7]
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641. [DOI:10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00114-3]
Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2019). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage. Pearson.
Bathaei, A. (2024). Agile Supply Chains: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Practices for Sustainable Business Operations. Journal of Social, management and tourism letter, 2024, 1-13.
Bhatti, A., Rehman, S. U., & Rumman, J. B. A. (2020). Organizational capabilities mediates between organizational culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational performance of SMEs in Pakistan. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 85-103. [DOI:10.15678/EBER.2020.080405]
Bettis, R. A., Ethiraj, S., Gambardella, A., Helfat, C., & Mitchell, W. (2016). Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management: A call for a broad and deep conversation among authors, referees, and editors. Strategic Management Journal, 257-261. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/43897939]
Boehmer, N., & Schinnenburg, H. (2023). Critical exploration of AI-driven HRM to build up organizational capabilities. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 45(5), 1057-1082. [https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2022-0202]
Brinia, V., Selimi, P., Dimos, A., & Kondea, A. (2022). The impact of communication on the effectiveness of educational organizations. Education Sciences, 12(3), 170. [https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030170]
Brous, P., Janssen, M., & Herder, P. (2020). The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 101952. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.008]
Bustinza, O. F., Vendrell-Herrero, F., Perez-Arostegui, M., & Parry, G. (2019). Technological capabilities, resilience capabilities and organizational effectiveness. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1370-1392. [DOI:10.1080/09585192.2016.1216878]
Chakraborty, D., & Biswas, W. (2020). Articulating the value of human resource planning (HRP) activities in augmenting organizational performance toward a sustained competitive firm. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(1), 62-90. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-01-2019-0025].
Dapilah, F., Nielsen, J. Ø., & Friis, C. (2020). The role of social networks in building adaptive capacity and resilience to climate change: A case study from northern Ghana. Climate and Development, 12(1), 42-56. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1596063].
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business research, 13(1), 215-246. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7].
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., ... & Wade, M. (2022). Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102456. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456].
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121. [https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266].
El Idrissi, M., El Manzani, Y., Maatalah, W. A., & Lissaneddine, Z. (2023). Organizational crisis preparedness during the COVID-19 pandemic: an investigation of dynamic capabilities and organizational agility roles. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(1), 27-49. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2021-2973].
Elkington, J. (1997). The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
Foroudi, P., Nazarian, A., Ziyadin, S., Kitchen, P., Hafeez, K., Priporas, C., & Pantano, E. (2020). Co-creating brand image and reputation through stakeholder’s social network. Journal of Business Research, 114, 42-59. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.035]
Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and mediating effects of innovation on the competitive advantage and firm’s performance: The moderating role of organizational learning capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 620-644. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00655-z]
Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European journal of social science research, 32(2), 231-253. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480].
García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V. J., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2018). Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 345-377. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0436-9]
Giannakos, M. N., Mikalef, P., & Pappas, I. O. (2022). Systematic literature review of e-learning capabilities to enhance organizational learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-17. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10097-2].
Gomes, G., Seman, L. O., Berndt, A. C., & Bogoni, N. (2022). The role of entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning capability and service innovation in organizational performance. Revista de Gestão, 29(1), 39-54. [https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-11-2020-0103].
Grant, R. M. (2024). Contemporary strategy analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120033. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033].
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). Strategic intent. Mckinsey quarterly, (1), 36-61.
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of management studies, 58(5), 1159-1197. [https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
]Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of management, 41(5), 1281-1312. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301]
Henry, A. (2021). Understanding strategic management. Oxford University Press.
Iranmanesh, M., Kumar, K. M., Foroughi, B., Mavi, R. K., & Min, N. H. (2021). The impacts of organizational structure on operational performance through innovation capability: innovative culture as moderator. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 1885-1911. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00407-y]
Jerab, D., & Mabrouk, T. (2023). How to Design an Effective Organizational Structure & the 21 Century Trends? Available at SSRN 4584646. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4584646]
Karman, A. (2020). Flexibility, coping capacity and resilience of organizations: between synergy and support. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(5), 883-907. [DOI:10.1108/JOCM-10-2019-0305]
Kabrilyants, R., Obeidat, B. Y., Alshurideh, M., & Masa'deh, R. E. (2021). The role of organizational capabilities on e-business successful implementation. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 417-432.
Konopik, J., Jahn, C., Schuster, T., Hoßbach, N., & Pflaum, A. (2022). Mastering the digital transformation through organizational capabilities: A conceptual framework. Digital Business, 2(2), 100019. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100019]
Koutroukis, T., Chatzinikolaou, D., Vlados, C., & Pistikou, V. (2022). The post-COVID-19 era, fourth industrial revolution, and new globalization: Restructured labor relations and organizational adaptation. Societies, 12(6), 187. [https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060187]
Lakhmani, S. G., Neubauer, C., Krausman, A., Fitzhugh, S. M., Berg, S. K., Wright, J. L., ... & Schaefer, K. E. (2022). Cohesion in human–autonomy teams: an approach for future research. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 23(6), 687-724.
Lee, D. (2020). Impact of organizational culture and capabilities on employee commitment to ethical behavior in the healthcare sector. Service Business, 14(1), 47-72. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-019-00410-8]
Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120614. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614]
Liu, C. H., Chang, A. Y. P., & Fang, Y. P. (2020). Network activities as critical sources of creating capability and competitive advantage: The mediating role of innovation capability and human capital. Management Decision, 58(3), 544-568. [https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0733]
Logeswaran, K., Savitha, S., Suresh, P., Prasanna Kumar, K. R., Gunasekar, M., Rajadevi, R., ... & Jayasurya, A. S. (2024). Unifying Technologies in Industry 4.0: Harnessing the Synergy of Internet of Things, Big Data, Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality, and Blockchain Technologies. Topics in Artificial Intelligence Applied to Industry 4.0, 127-147. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394216147.ch7]
Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., ... & Mena, L. J. (2023). Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, 15(14), 11221. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411221]
Mızrak, F. (2024). Effective change management strategies: Exploring dynamic models for organizational transformation. In Perspectives on artificial intelligence in times of turbulence: Theoretical background to applications (pp. 135-162). IGI Global. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-6684-9814-9.ch009]
Mohmedi, A., Zolfaghari, R. and Gholam hossein zadeh, M. (2024). Presenting the agility model of the organization in order to improve the productivity of human resources. Management and Educational Perspective, 6(3), 314-335. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2024.474819.1409. (In Persian)
Moon, Y., & Armstrong, D. J. (2020). Service quality factors affecting customer attitudes in online-to-offline commerce. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 18(1), 1-34. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-019-00459-y]
Motamedimoghadam, M., Mira da Silva, M., & Amaral, M. (2024). Organizational capabilities for digital innovation: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management. [DOI:10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0227]
Musa, S., & Enggarsyah, D. T. (2024). Absorptive capacity, organizational creativity, organizational agility, organizational resilience and competitive advantage in disruptive environments. Journal of Strategy and Management. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2023-0265]
Orieno, O. H., Udeh, C. A., Oriekhoe, O. I., Odonkor, B., & Ndubuisi, N. L. (2024). Innovative management strategies in contemporary organizations: a review: analyzing the evolution and impact of modern management practices, with an emphasis on leadership, organizational culture, and change management. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(1), 167-190. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i1.727]
Park, S., & Park, S. (2021). How can employees adapt to change? Clarifying the adaptive performance concepts. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(1), E1-E15. [https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21411]
Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Harvard Business Press.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard business review, 68(3), 79-91.
Pratono, A. H. (2024). Multiple flexible suppliers and competitive advantage during market turbulence: the role of digital capabilities. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 37(2), 437-455. [DOI:10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0339]
Rasche, C., & Wolfrum, S. (1994). Reorganization of the corporation: the fourteen tasks of the corporate university. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5(4), 337-364.
Rengkung, L. R. (2022). Exploration and exploitation: driving organizational capability and organizational change toward competitive advantage. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 44(1), 39-51. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.05]
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of management annals, 12(1), 390-439. [DOI:10.5465/annals.2016.0014]
Shafique, I., Kalyar, M. N., Shafique, M., Kianto, A., & Beh, L. S. (2022). Demystifying the link between knowledge management capability and innovation ambidexterity: organizational structure as a moderator. Business Process Management Journal, 28(5/6), 1343-1363. [https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2021-0713]
Silva, P., Moreira, A. C., & Mota, J. (2023). Employees' perception of corporate social responsibility and performance: the mediating roles of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 92-111. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2021-0213]
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California management review, 58(4), 13-35. [https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13]
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons.
Torkzadeh, J., & Razi, E. (2023). Management for Sustainability; A Change Approach in Social Systems. Research Institude of HAWZAH & UNIVERSITY. (In Persian)
Torkzadeh, J., Mohammadi, M., Salimi, Gh., & Forough, B. M. (2017). Academic Empowerment with a Strategic Approach: a Situational Framework for Planning the Development of Bamiyan University, Afghanistan. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 6(11), 133-157. )In Persian(
Van der Voet, J., & Steijn, B. (2021). Team innovation through collaboration: How visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1275-1294. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1743344]
Varadarajan, R. (2023). Resource advantage theory, resource based theory, and theory of multimarket competition: does multimarket rivalry restrain firms from leveraging resource advantages?. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113713. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113713]
Weiner, B. J. (2020). A theory of organizational readiness for change. In Handbook on implementation science (pp. 215-232). Edward Elgar Publishing. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67]
Widianto, S., Lestari, Y. D., Adna, B. E., Sukoco, B. M., & Nasih, M. (2021). Dynamic managerial capabilities, organisational capacity for change and organisational performance: the moderating effect of attitude towards change in a public service organisation. Journal of organizational effectiveness: people and performance, 8(1), 149-172. [DOI:10.1108/JOEPP-02-2020-0028]
Xiao, Y. (2025). Pathways to scaling up in emerging economies: A configurational analysis of organizational capabilities in social enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115091. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115091].
Yasin, R. (2021). Responsible leadership and employees’ turnover intention. Explore the mediating roles of ethical climate and corporate image. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1760-1781. [DOI:10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0583]
Zacharias, T., Rahawarin, M. A., & Yusriadi, Y. (2021). Cultural reconstruction and organization environment for employee performance. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 296-315. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/801]
Zhang, J., & Chen, Z. (2024). Exploring human resource management digital transformation in the digital age. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1482-1498. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01214-y]
دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 28
تابستان 1405
صفحه 509-533

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 20 بهمن 1404