طراحی مدل جذب و استخدام نسل‌های Y و Z در سازمان‌های بخش دولتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کیفی )

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت ، واحد رشت،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی،رشت ایران.

2 گروه مدیریت، واحدرشت،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،رشت،ایران.

3 گروه مدیریت،واحد رشت،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،رشت،ایران.

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر طراحی مدل جذب و استخدام نسل‌های Y و Z در سازمان‌های بخش دولتی می‌باشد. روش پژوهش با توجه به هدف آن، کاربردی و از حیث شیوه اجرا، کیفی و با استفاده از فراترکیب می‎باشد. از رویکرد تئوری ترکیبی استفاده شد تا با در نظر گرفتن نظریه نسل‌ها (مانهایم، 1952)، همگروهی نسلی (استراوس و هاو، 1991) و نظریه انگیزش-بهداشت (هرزبرگ، 1959) چارچوب مناسبی برای انتخاب و تحلیل عوامل اتخاذ شود. سوال اصلی این مطالعه با تکیه بر روش فراترکیب طراحی شد. مقالات کیفی به‌طور هدفمند انتخاب و از طریق مراحل مختلف ارزیابی شدند. در نهایت، تعداد 27 مطالعه با قابلیت اطمینان 95 درصد بررسی و مدل نهایی با استفاده از الگوی ارتباطی موجود در نرم‌افزار MAXQDA 2020 طراحی گردید. نتایج نشان داد که برای جذب و استخدام کارکنان نسل‌های Y و Z، در نظر گرفتن چهار بُعد و 30 عامل ضروری است که از بین این عوامل، بیشترین تاکید باید بر روی مسائلی نظیر استخدام با استفاده از فضای مجازی، تعادل کار-زندگی، حس تعلق به کار، سنجش کارایی فرد هنگام استخدام، نظام جبران خدمات شفاف، ارزش‌های کاری و سیاست‌های مهارت‌آموزی صورت پذیرد. بکارگیری راهبردهای همسو با عوامل مذکور می‌تواند در افزایش جذب و ظرفیت‌پذیری سازمان‌ها و کاهش ترک شغل کارکنان نسل‌های در حال ظهور موثر واقع شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Design of Model of Recruitment and Recruitment of Y and Z generations in public sector organizations

نویسندگان English

Vahideh Abasi 1
Mehrdad Goudarzvand Chegini 2
Morad Rezaee Dizgah 3
1 Department of Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.
2 Department of Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.
3 Department of Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.
چکیده English

Abstract
The aim of the present study is to design a model for recruiting and hiring generations Y and Z in public sector organizations. The research method is applicable in terms of its purpose, and qualitative in terms of its implementation method, using meta-synthesis. A mixed theory approach was used to adopt an appropriate framework for selecting and analyzing factors by considering the theory of generations of Mannheim (1952), generational cohorts of Strauss and Howe (1991), and the motivation-hygiene theory of Herzberg (1959). The main question of this study was designed based on the meta-synthesis method. Qualitative articles were purposefully selected and evaluated through different stages. Finally, 27 studies were reviewed with a reliability of 95%, and the final model was designed using the communication model available in MAXQDA 2020 software. The results showed that in order to attract and hire employees of generations Y and Z, it is necessary to consider four dimensions and 30 factors, of which the most emphasis should be placed on issues such as recruitment using virtual space, work-life balance, sense of belonging to work, measuring individual performance during employment, transparent compensation system, work values, and skills training policies. Applying strategies aligned with the aforementioned factors can be effective in increasing the recruitment and capacity of organizations and reducing the job turnover of employees of emerging generations.
Introduction
A specific study of different generations allows organizational managers to adopt appropriate policies for them by creating greater understanding of the characteristics of that generation (So Hee & Yeojin, 2024). Given the changes and developments in generational retention and management policies, it is obvious that public sector organizations also feel threatened by the presence of multi-generational workforces in their workplaces and are thinking about managing different generations (Krajac & Samardzija, 2024).
Generational theory, which refers to the recognition of different generations, was first introduced by a sociologist named Karl Mannheim (1952) in a book titled “Generation Theory”, and gradually attention was paid to this concept and its various dimensions by researchers and scholars (Murvanidze, 2020; Orrheim & Thunvall, 2018). Most studies related to generational differences in the workplace have also focused their assumptions on psychological and behavioral differences (Kwiecińska et al, 2023). There were no generational studies in the country before the end of the 1980s, and if there is any information about youth, the elderly, etc., it is related to demographic and statistical issues of population distribution (Abbasi Asafjir et al, 2013).
Generational groups can be divided into five categories: traditionalists, childbearing, Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Z (Otieno & Nyambegera, 2019). In a work environment, these same different generations are also present, each of whom perceives the environment around them differently from other generations (Leslie et al, 2021). Studies conducted over the past years have often focused on issues such as the characteristics of Generation Y and Z in terms of attitudes towards environmental protection, motivation for work, work independence, mental priorities, and educational and learning programs (Kuzior et al, 2023). Therefore, attention to the above aspects in the recruitment and hiring process of these two generations should be considered, and the way to enter the recruitment process and how to sign a contract with these two generations should be in a way that, while taking into account their values ​​and priorities, increases their motivation and enthusiasm for being present and working in organizations. Therefore, designing a recruitment model based on Generation Y and Z in public sector organizations is one of the most critical issues and challenges facing human resource managers and heads of these organizations, which have been addressed in the present study. Therefore, the main question is: what is the recruitment and hiring model for Generations Y and Z in public sector organizations?
Theoretical Framework
Generations Y and Z
Generation Z is the first group to have fully grown in the digital world. This group of people is known as the first generation that has been familiar with digital technologies, the Internet, and smartphones since birth. The fact that they have been constantly exposed to advanced technologies during their growing up has had a profound impact on the way they think, interact, and behave socially. Some researchers call this generation “digital natives” because, unlike previous generations who had to get used to using technologies, Generation Z has grown up with these technologies naturally and without the need for special training (Koushki & Taghipour, 2023). The birth of Generation Y began somewhere in the late 1970s or early 1980s and ended in the early 2000s, which in Iran corresponds to the beginning of the 1350s to the end of the 1370s. The sixties are the first generation that their parents seek help with technology (Nasiri et al, 2024).
Akbari et al, (2023) investigated the identification of factors affecting the retention of Generation Z employees in the compensation and benefits system in the capital market. The content analysis method was used as one of the qualitative research methods for this purpose. The research paradigm was interpretive, and semi-structured interviews were used as a research tool to collect primary data from Generation Z employees in the capital market. These employees were selected through maximum diversity purposive sampling. A total of 26 interviews, after analysis, led to the identification of 3 overarching themes, 11 organizing themes, and 79 basic themes, which are based on the existence of specific criteria for granting salaries and benefits, the perception of fairness in salaries and benefits, and flexibility in benefits and special benefits.
Dehghan et al, (2023) investigated the factors affecting the special attraction and recruitment of Generation Z employees. The results of the study identified 6 levels of importance in identifying factors affecting the attraction and recruitment of Generation Z employees. At the first level, 5 indicators (qualification index, organizational selection system improvement index, organizational attractiveness index, highlighting goals and values ​​index, and creating an environment of accountability and acceptance of transformational managers) were determined, and finally, the variables of need assessment and public information, making jobs attractive to Generation Z, measuring the capacity and efficiency coefficient of the individual during recruitment, measuring the computer skills of individuals, recruiting using social networks, applying for online jobs, and building a personal brand were identified as the most fundamental elements of the model. Finally, based on the Mikmaq scenario analysis, 6 indicators and 21 sub-indicators were identified, which are the scenarios of measuring the capacity and efficiency coefficient of the individual during recruitment, applying for online jobs, and building a personal brand, providing benefits commensurate with academic capabilities, and planning the design of attractive jobs, division of labor according to the abilities of the generation, educational policies in management fields, and increasing skills training.
Research Methodology
The research method is applicable in terms of its purpose, and qualitative in terms of its implementation method, using meta-synthesis. A mixed theory approach was used to adopt an appropriate framework for selecting and analyzing factors by considering the theory of generations of Mannheim (1952), generational cohorts of Strauss and Howe (1991), and the motivation-hygiene theory of Herzberg (1959). The main question of this study was designed based on the meta-synthesis method.
Research findings
Qualitative articles were purposefully selected and evaluated through different stages. Finally, 27 studies were reviewed with a reliability of 95%, and the final model was designed using the communication model available in MAXQDA 2020 software. The results showed that in order to attract and hire employees of generations Y and Z, it is necessary to consider four dimensions and 30 factors, of which the most emphasis should be placed on issues such as recruitment using virtual space, work-life balance, sense of belonging to work, measuring individual performance during employment, transparent compensation system, work values, and skills training policies. Applying strategies aligned with the aforementioned factors can be effective in increasing the recruitment and capacity of organizations and reducing the job turnover of employees of emerging generations.
Conclusion
The present study was conducted with the aim of designing a model for recruiting and hiring generations Y and Z in public sector organizations. The results of this study are consistent with the results of Akbari et al, (2023), Dehghan et al, (2023), Moffett et al, (2023), Niknam et al, (2022), Leslie et al, (2021), Chillakuri (2020), and Sidorcuka & Chesnovicka (2018). Sidorcuka & Chesnovicka (2018) showed that this generation of employees is looking for employers who meet their needs and preferences, otherwise they are not willing to stay in the relevant organization. Among their most important preferences are flexible working hours, job diversity, company reputation, promotion and advancement, and special fringe benefits.
According to the research results, it is suggested that if managers and heads of organizations pay special attention to the processes of hiring new workers, they can increase the level of innovation and ensure the improvement of the quality of service delivery while reducing training costs.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Recruitment
Attract
Generation Y
Generation Z
Sense of Belonging to Work
Compensation System
ABBASI ESFANJIR, A., SAM, S., & AMIRIAN, R. (2013). GENERATION GAP IN VALUES: COMPARISON OF THE YOUNG AND ELDERLY. JOURNAL OF SPECIALIZED SOCIAL SCIENCE, 10(38), 162-185. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/255029/en. (in Persian)
Akbari, S., & Gholipour, A., & Nargesian, A. (2023). Identifying factors affecting the retention of Generation Z employees in the capital market (salary and benefits system). Human Resource Management Research. 15 (1) (51). 11 - 52. (in Persian)
Acheampong, N. A. A. (2021). Reward preferences of the youngest generation: Attracting, recruiting, and retaining generation Z into public sector organizations. Compensation & Benefits Review, 53(2), 75-97.
Ardueser, C., & Garza, D. (2021). Exploring Cross-Generational Traits and Management Across Generations in the Workforce: A Theoretical Literature Review. In RAIS Conference Proceedings 2021 (No. 0011). Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4639566
Ashraf, R. (2018). Multigenerational employees: Strategies for effective management. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 7(3), 1-3. DOI:10.4172/2162-6359.1000528
Bencsik, A., & Horváth-Csikós, G., & Juhász, T. (2016). Y and Z Generations at Workplaces. Journal of competitiveness, 8(3). DOI:10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Bennett, M. M., Beehr, T. A., & Ivanitskaya, L. V. (2017). Work-family conflict: Differences across generations and life cycles. Journal of Managerial Psychology. DOI:10.1108/JMP-06-2016-0192
Bos, K. (2021). Recruiting Gen Z Workers to Ontario Municipalities: A Study of How Ontario Municipalities Can Improve Recruitment Strategies to Attract Gen Z Workers. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/lgp-mrps/190.
Britten, N., & Campbell, R., & Pope, C., & Donovan, J., & Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. Journal of health services research & policy, 7(4), 209-215. DOI: 10.1258/135581902320432732
Calloway, C. (2018). Recruiting and Retaining Generations X and Y in Organizations.
Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02- 2020-0058
Cooke, A., & Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative health research, 22(10), 1435-1443. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312452938
Dehghan, D., & Aghadavod Jolfaei, S.R., & Delavi Esfahani, M.R. (2023). Factors affecting the specific attraction and use of Generation Z employees. Quarterly Journal of Development and Transformation Management. 15(53). 149-171 (DOI): 10.22094/jdem.2023.705868. (in Persian)
Dixon-Woods, M., & Sutton, A., & Shaw, R., & Miller, T., & Smith, J., & Young, B., & Jones, D. (2007). Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Journal of health services research & policy, 12(1), 42-47. doi: 10.1258/135581907779497486.
Dunaetz, D. R., & Wong, D. T., & Draper, A. L., & Salsman, J. P. (2022). Barriers to leading small groups among Generation Z and younger Millennials: An exploratory factor analysis and implications for recruitment and training. Christian Education Journal, 19(1), 152-169. DOI:10.1177/07398913211018482
Francis Jr, C. C. (2019). Generation Y: Strategies for federal government recruitment and retention (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland University College).
Gough, D. (2007). Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Assessing quality in applied and practice-based research in education., 103-118. DOI:10.1080/02671520701296189
Grencíková, A., & Vojtovic, S. (2017). Relationship of generations X, Y, Z with new communication technologies. Problems and perspectives in management, (15, Iss. 2 (cont. 3)), 557-563. DOI:10.21511/ppm.15(si).2017.09.
Gursoy, D., & Maier, T. A., & Chi, C. G. (2008). Generational differences: An examination of work values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. International journal of hospitality management, 27(3), 448-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.11.002
Janssen, D., & Carradini, S. (2021). Generation Z workplace communication habits and expectations. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(2), 137-153. DOI:10.1109/TPC.2021.3069288
Jones, J. S., & Murray, S. R., & Tapp, S. R. (2018). Generational differences in the workplace. Journal of Business Diversity, 18(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.33423/jbd.v18i2.528.
Karasek, A., & Hysa, B. (2020). Social media and generation Y, Z–a challenge for employers. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, (144), 227-237. DOI:10.29119/1641-3466.2020.144.18
Kashanian, Z. (2013). Simulating the impact of aging on macroeconomic variables (an application of the overlapping generations general equilibrium method). Master's thesis, Al-Zahra University. . (in Persian)
Koushki, S., & Taghipour, A. (2023). Comparison of personality traits and psychological well-being in generations z, y, x in employees of the Welfare Organization of Tehran, Second National Conference on Industrial and Organizational Psychology with a Focus on Mental Health, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/1905027. (in Persian)
Krajac, L., & Samardzija, J. (2024). WORKPLACE MOTIVATION ACROSS X, Y, AND Z GENERATIONS: AN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR PERSPECTIVE. In Economic and Social Development (Book of Proceedings), 112th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development .561.
Krisdayanti, K., & Lianto, L. (2023). The Evolution of Work-Life Balance: The Workplace Hopes and Challenges for Generation Z. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v6i2.5953
Kuzior, A., & Postrzednik-Lotko, K. A., & Smołka-Franke, B., & Sobotka, B. (2023). Managing competences of generation Y and Z in the opinion of the management staff in the Modern Business Services Sector. Sustainability, 15(7), 5741. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075741
Kwiecińska, M., & Grzesik, K., Siewierska-Chmaj, A., & Popielska-Borys, A. (2023). Generational differences in values and patterns of thinking in the workplace. Argumenta Oeconomica, 1(50). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Langer, S., & Chew‐Graham, C., & Hunter, C., & Guthrie, E. A., & Salmon, P. (2013). Why do patients with long‐term conditions use unscheduled care? A qualitative literature review. Health & social care in the community, 21(4), 339-351. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01093.x
Lebowitz, S. (2018). 6 ways millennials have it easier than their parents did. Business Insider, available at: https://www. businessinsider. com/millennials-lives-compared-to-gen-x-babyboomers-2018-3.
Leslie, B., & Anderson, C., & Bickham, C., & Horman, J., & Overly, A., & Gentry, C., & Callahan, C., & King, J. (2021). Generation Z perceptions of a positive workplace environment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 33(3), 171-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09366-2.
Lim, P., & Parker, A. (2020). Next in Line: Generation Z. In Mentoring Millennials in an Asian Context (pp. 127-134). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781789734836
Lyons, S. T., & Schweitzer, L., & Urick, M. J., & Kuron, L. (2019). A dynamic social-ecological model of generational identity in the workplace. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 17(1), 1-24. DOI:10.1080/15350770.2018.1500332
Majidi Gharetapeh, J., & Rezaei, A., & Malek Akhlaq, A. (2019). Identifying and examining Generation Z and how to manage them in the workplace, Fourth National Conference on Management, Accounting and Economics with an Emphasis on Regional and Global Marketing, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/915658. (in Persian)
Mahmoud, A. B., & Fuxman, L., & Mohr, I., & Reisel, W. D., & Grigoriou, N. (2020). “We aren't your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448.
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–322). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1927/1928). DOI: 10.4236/sm.2013.31003
McGraw, L., & Stewart, C. (2020). RECRUITING AND RETAINING THE GENIUS GENERATION FOR VIRTUAL TEAMS FROM A GENERATION Z PERSPECTIVE. International Journal of Business Research & Information Technology (IJBRIT), 7(1).
Moffett, S. G., & Bradley, L., & Hampton, A., & McGowan, P. (2023). Generations and the Future of Work: case study exploration of Business Stakeholder perspectives on Zillennials in the Northern Irish workplace. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(8), 1784-1806. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-02-2022-0189
Murvanidze, E. (2020). Understanding Generation Z as a Future Workforce and its Perception of the Global Trends in Organizational Design. Master’s thesis in International Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, School of Business and Governance.
Ngoc Thang, N., & Rowley, C., & Mayrhofer, W., & Anh, N. T. P. (2022). Generation Z job seekers in Vietnam: CSR-based employer attractiveness and job pursuit intention. Asia Pacific Business Review, 1-19. DOI:10.1080/13602381.2022.2058217
Nasiri, F., & Nargesian, A., & Gholipor, A. (2024). Identifying the Expectations of Working Generations X, Y and Z from the Compensation Process (Salaries, Benefits and Rewards) in Tejarat Bank. Public Organizations Management, 12(Vol 4 , Series 48), 167-186. doi: 10.30473/ipom.2024.72159.5023. (in Persian)
Niknam, O. A., & Alipoor Darvishi, Z., & MOHAMMADI MOGHADDAM, Y., & Salehi Sedghiani, J. (2022). Designing and explaining the of Sustainable Belongings Model of New Generation Employees through Grounded Theory (A Study in Information and Communication Technology Business). JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 13(4 (46) ), 157-189. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1046171/en . (in Persian)
Orrheim, E., & Thunvall, L. (2018). How organizations can improve attraction and retention of Generation Z. Master Thesis in Business Administration, Jönköping International Business School.
Otieno, J. O., & Nyambegera, S. M. (2019). Millennials and Generation Z Employees are here: Is your Organization ready?. Journal of Language, Technology & Entrepreneurship in Africa, 10(2), 68-85.
Pham, N. A. T., & Tran, N. V. K. (2021). Employer Branding in Generation Z Recruitment: a study on Vietnamese Gen Z’s perceptions and job seeking behaviors.
Pires, C. (2017). Analysis of how companies should prepare to recruit and manage Generation Z.
Plakhotnik, M. S., & Volkova, N. V., & Shahzad, M. B. (2024). Investigating job characteristics of generations Y and Z: A latent profile analysis. Global Business and Organizational Excellence.
Ratajczak, J. (2020). Recruitment and motivation of Generation Z in the face of the employee’s market. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 4(1), 37-50. DOI:10.18559/ref.2020.1.4
Rautanen, E. (2022). Social Media Recruitment: How to target young professionals of the generation Z.
Sakdiyakorn, M., & Golubovskaya, M., & Solnet, D. (2021). Understanding Generation Z through collective consciousness: Impacts for hospitality work and employment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102822
Sarikaya, O. (2021). Problems faced by Gen Y in recruitment processes and HRM mistakes. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 8(1), 44-50.
Şerife, U. Ğ. U. Z., & YILDIRIM, M. H. (2020). Human resources strategies for the recruitment and retention of generation Y employees. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 35(2), 431-442.
Seth, T., & Lee, J. (2017). Consensus and conflict: Exploring moderating effects of knowledge workers on industry environment and entrepreneurial entry relationship. Journal of Business Research, 78, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.003
Sidorcuka, I., & Chesnovicka, A. (2018). Methods of attraction and retention of generation Z staff. CBU International Conference Proceedings, 807-814. March 22-24. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.1030.
So Hee, L., & Yeojin, Y. (2024). Work values and communication styles among Generation X, Y, and Z nurses: A cross‐sectional study. International nursing review, 71(1), 115-121. DOI: 10.1111/inr.12863
Stern, P. N., & Harris, C. C. (1985). Women's health and the self‐care paradox. A model to guide self‐care readiness. Health care for women international, 6(1-3), 151-163. DOI: 10.1080/07399338509515689
Taylor, P., & Keeter, S. (2010). Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change. Pew Research Center.
Thompson, A. (2020). Values-Based Recruitment: Recruitment Strategy Effectiveness on Gaining Generation Z Matriculation.
Warmerdam, A., & Lewis, I., & Banks, T. (2015). Gen Y recruitment: Understanding graduate intentions to join an organisation using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Education+ Training, 57(5), 560-574. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2013-0133.
Wübbelt, A., & Tirrel, H. (2022). Attracting members of Generation Z to companies via social media recruiting in Germany. Human Technology, 18(3), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-3.2.
Zehetner, A., & Zehetner, D. (2019). Recruitment marketing: Do we understand what Generation Z expects from its future employers?. In Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (No. 9812299). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences. DOI:10.20472/IAC.2019.049.047
Ziaee, M. S., & Nargesian, J. (2023). Providing a Talent Retention Model among Generation Z Employees of Government Organizations. Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1), 26-56. doi: 10.22034/jhrs.2023.391233.2055. (in Persian)

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 24 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 23 فروردین 1404