نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کمی )

نویسندگان

1 دکتری مدیریت صنعتی، باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سیرجان، ایران

2 دکتری مدیریت رسانه ،گروه مدیریت رسانه ،دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات ، تهران، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت اجرایی،گروه مدیریت،واحد کرمان ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران

4 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی،گروه مدیریت ، موسسه آموزش عالی صنعتی فولاد، فولاد شهر، ایران

چکیده

هدف تحقیق حاضر مدل سازی ساختاری تأثیر سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر رفتار شهروندی سازمانی در مراکز آموزش فنی و حرفه‌ای استان کرمان می‌باشد. این تحقیق به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت و روش، از نوع همبستگی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری این تحقیق عبارت است از کلیه کارکنان در مراکز آموزش فنی و حرفه‌ای استان کرمان که تعداد آن‌ها در سال 1400 به 207 نفر بالغ گردیده است. به دلیل محدودیت جامعه آماری تمامی اعضای آن به عنوان نمونه انتخاب و به صورت سرشماری مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از دو پرسشنامة سرپرستی توهین آمیز میتچل و آمبروس (2007) و رفتار شهروندی سازمانی اورگان (1998) استفاده شد. روایی محتوایی پرسشنامه‌ها براساس نظر خبرگان، و روایی سازه آن با روش تحلیل عاملی تاییدی بررسی شد. پایایی آن‌ها نیز با محاسبة، پایایی ترکیبی ضریب آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد. داده‌های جمع‌آوری‌شده با روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار لیزرل تجزیه ‌و تحلیل شد. یافته‌های تحقیق حاکی از آن است که به طور کلی سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر رفتار شهروندی سازمانی تأثیر معکوس و معناداری دارد. با افزایش رفتارهای توهین آمیز سرپرست، کارکنان روحیه خود را از دست می‌دهند در نتیجه انگیزه آنها پایین می‌آید و در نتیجه رفتار شهروندی سازمانی کاهش می‌یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural modeling of the effect of offensive supervision on organizational citizenship behavior (Case study: Technical and vocational training centers in Kerman province)

نویسندگان [English]

  • asadollah Alirezaei 1
  • mohammad Emami 2
  • Asma Abbasgholizadeh 3
  • Zahra Yazdani Kachoei 4

1 PhD ,Industrial Management, Young and Elite Researchers Club, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran

2 PhD ,Media Management, Department of Media Management, University of Science and Research, Tehran, Iran

3 Master of Executive Management, Department of Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

4 Master of Business Management, Department of Management, Steel Higher Industrial Education Institute, Fooladshahr, Iran

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is structural modeling of the effect of offensive supervision on organizational citizenship behavior in technical and vocational education centers in Kerman province. This research is applicable in terms of purpose, and correlative in nature and method. The statistical population of this research is all employees in technical and vocational training centers in Kerman province, whose number has increased to 207 in 2021. Due to the limitations of the statistical population, all its members have been selected as a sample and studied by census. Questionnaires of Mitchell and Ambrose (2007) and Oregon Organizational Citizenship Behavior (1998) were used to collect data. The content validity of the questionnaires was assessed based on the opinion of experts, and the construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis. Their reliability was also confirmed by calculating the combined reliability of Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The collected data were analyzed by structural equation modeling with LISREL software. Findings indicate that in general, offensive supervision has a significant inverse effect on organizational citizenship behavior. As the supervisor's offensive behaviors increase, employees lose their morale, as a result of which their motivation decreases and eventually, organizational citizenship behavior decreases.
Introduction
An issue raised in the last two decades and in addition to behaviorists, has also attracted the attention of psychologists and sociologists, is organizational citizenship behavior (ho & Le, 2020). Organizational citizenship behavior is a valuable and useful behavior (Sadeghi afjeh, 2014) that includes various behaviors of employees such as accepting and taking on additional responsibilities, following the rules and procedures of the organization, maintaining and developing a positive attitude, patience and Tolerance of dissatisfaction and problems in the workplace (Qiu et al, 2019). Thus, organizational citizenship behavior contributes to the efficiency and effectiveness of organizations through resource changes, innovations, and adaptability (Gholam Hossaini, 2011). The most important indicator of organizational citizenship behavior is more effort to achieve the goals of the organization, in a situation where the individual is not accounted on and the job is not considered as an individual duty (eghbal et al, 2018; Lopez-dominguez et al, 2013). Examining organizational citizenship behavior and its influencing factors due to the importance of such behaviors to respond to changing demands in today's turbulent and dynamic environments and markets, seems necessary (Podsakoff, et al, 2009; liu & cohen, 2010; rukkhum & Bartlett, 2012; ho & Le, 2020). Meanwhile, a new concept has entered the management literature that has negative effects on organizations. In recent decades, there has been a growing research movement on the subject of offensive supervision, defined as "employee perceptions of leaders' continued use of verbal and nonverbal hostile behaviors, which of course do not include physical contact and action." "(Tepper, 2000). Offensive leadership, which is recognized as one of the most prominent forms of destructive leadership (karsikova, et al, 2013), has detrimental effects on the organization and subordinates (martinko, et al, 2013; Tepper, 2000).
According to the above, the main issue of the research is: what effect does offensive supervision have on organizational citizenship behavior (Case study: technical and vocational training centers in Kerman province)?
Theoretical framework
Organizational citizenship behaviors have a special place in governmental and public organizations (Caillier, 2015; Chan & lai, 2017), because they directly and indirectly contribute to the effectiveness of the organization (Lepine, Erez & Johnso, 2002; Bowling, 2010; Ahmed & Filadelfo, 2016). Organizational citizenship behavior refers to those activities related to the role of individuals in the organization that go beyond the expectations of the job and job description. Although the organization's formal reward system does not identify these behaviors, the individual performs these activities at a level beyond these formal rewards (Castro et al, 2004). Tepper (2000) defines offensive supervision as "employees' perceptions of leaders' continueous use of verbal and nonverbal hostile behaviors - which, of course, do not include physical action and contact." Offensive supervision has negative effects on organizations, offensive supervision has a negative impact on the mental health of subordinates. Threats and real loss of resources activate the stress process, which in turn causes harm to employees' health (Carlson et al, 2012).
 Ho & Le (2020) conducted a study to examine the relationship between benevolent leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors with the mediating role of member leader exchange in Vietnamese universities. The results of the analysis show the mediating effect of leader-member exchange in the communication between benevolent leadership confirms citizenship behavior. University leaders can benevolently motivate university staff to engage in extra-role behaviors that motivate not only the organization but also other colleagues and students by fostering a good, high-quality leader exchange.
kee et al (2019) conducted a study entitled "The Effects of Genuine Leadership on Leadership Trust, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Service Quality in China's Hospitality Industry". According to the results, genuine leadership has a significant effect on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior and service quality in China's hospitality industry.
Methodology
This research is descriptive-correlative in nature, and practical in terms of purpose. The statistical population of this study includes all employees of technical and vocational training centers in Kerman province, whose number is 207 in 2021. Due to the limited statistical population, all its members have been selected as a sample and studied by census. 199 completed questionnaires were collected. To collect data related to research variables, Mitchell and Ambrose (2007) Offensive Supervision Questionnaire (10 questions) and Oregon(1998) Organizational Citizenship Behavior (15 questions); based on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) were used.
Discussion and Results
In order to test the research hypothesis and analyze the data, Lisrel software was used and the results showed that the significant numbers between the active assaults on organizational citizenship behavior are -10.63, which is significant because this value is greater than 1.96. The standard number between active assaults on organizational citizenship behavior is -0.84. Active assault has an inverse effect on organizational citizenship behavior, that is, it decreases with increasing active aggression on organizational citizenship behavior. Also, the significant numbers between passive aggressions on organizational citizenship behavior are -11.11. Because this value is greater than 1.96; a passive attack on organizational citizenship behavior is significant. This relationship is inverse and significant, that is, it decreases with increasing passive aggression on organizational citizenship behavior. The standard coefficient of passive attack on organizational citizenship behavior is -0.59, so passive attack has an inverse effect on organizational citizenship behavior.
Conclusion
The aim of this study was to investigate the structural modeling of the effect of offensive supervision on organizational citizenship behavior (Case study: technical and vocational training centers in Kerman province). The results of this study are consistent with the results of the findings of Ari et al, (2007, and Zelares et al, (2002). Based on the results of hypothesis testing, offensive supervision has a significant and inverse effect on organizational citizenship behavior. That is, with the increase of offensive behaviors of the supervisor, employees lose their morale; as a result, their motivation decreases and consequently, organizational citizenship behavior decreases, so offensive supervision has a fundamental role in reducing citizenship behavior. Organizational citizenship behavior also decreases with increasing active and passive aggressive behavior. In other words, with the decrease of offensive behaviors, organizational citizenship behavior increases. Thus, the managers of technical and vocational training centers must minimize offensive and abusive behaviors in order to improve their performance and response to clients. Therefore, proper and compassionate management can improve citizenship behavior and consequently improve performance. Offensive supervising always blames and harasses subordinates for previous mistakes or negligence, or humiliates and contempts subordinates in the presence of others (Tepper, 2000). Unpleasant experiences of such offensive behaviors in daily activities by subordinates leads to the decrease of job satisfaction level (Hobman et al, 2009; Bowling & michell, 2011; kornan & et al, 2011). Offensive supervision reduces the level of organizational commitment and organizational identity of employees, and causes employees to not perform even properly in addition to extra-role behaviors. Behaviors such as attacking employees' self-esteem, insulting and humiliating them, and mocking them also reduce the positive attitudes that people share while doing work and reduce role-playing behaviors.
According to the results of this study, managers are advised to avoid offensive behaviors to encourage employees to engage in organizational citizenship behaviors, and motivate them to show voluntary or extra-role behaviors in addition to their main duties by encouraging. In the practical field, it is suggested to study the factors that can play a mediating or moderating role in the relationship between offensive supervision and organizational citizenship behavior.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Offensive leadership
  • active aggression
  • .passive aggression
  • organizational citizenship behavior
Afsar, B. & Badir, F. Y. (2016).Person–organization fit, perceived organizational support, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of job embeddedness. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(3): 252-278.
Ahmed, M. M., & Filadelfo, L. (2016). Public Service Motivation and Organizational Performance in Mexico: Testing the Mediating Effects of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. International Journal of Public Administration, 39: 40–48.
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y. & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X. & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393–411.
Ashfaq, S., Mahmood, Z. & Ahmad, M. (2013). Impact of Work-Life Conflict and Work over Load on Employee Performance in Banking Sector of Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(5), 688-695.
Bamberger, P. A. & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59(6), 723–752.
Belogolovsky, E. & Somech, A. (2010). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the perspective of teachers, principals and parents. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 914-923.
Bennett, R. J. and Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.
Bottomley, P., Ahmed, M. M., Seymour, G., & Filadelfo. L. (2016). The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Contingent Role of Public Service Motivation. British Journal of Management, 27: 390–405.
Bowling, N. (2010). Effects of Job Satisfaction and Conscientiousness on Extra-Role Behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1): 119–130.
Bowling, N. A. & Michel, J. S. (2011). Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates’ responses to abusive supervision. Work and Stress, 25(4), 309–320.
Caillier, G. J. (2015). Towards a better understanding of public service motivation and mission valence in public agencies. Public Management Review, 17(9): 1217-1236.
Carlson, D., Ferguson, M., Hunter, E. & Whitten, D. (2012). Abusive supervision and work-family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 849–859.
Castro, C. B., Armario, E. M., Ruiz, D. M. (2004). "The influence of employee organizational citizenship behavior on customer loyalty ", International journal of Service industry management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp 27-53.
Chan, S. H., & Lai, H. Y. (2017). Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, 70 (2017): 214–223.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 199-236.
Gholam Hossaini, E., Bejani, H., Maleki Niya, E. (2011). Influencing Factors,Constituents and Consequences of Organization Citizenship Behavior. Police Organizational Development, 7(31), 11-34(in persian).
Ghosh, R., Reio, T. G., & Haynes, R. K. (2012). Mentoring and organizational citizenship behavior: Estimating the mediating effects of organization-based self-esteem and affective commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23: 41-63.
Gilbert, S. Laschinger, H. Leiter, M. (2010). The mediating effect of burnout on the relationship between structural empowerment and organizational citizenship behaviours. Journal of Nursing Management, 339-349.
Goldman, A. (2009). Transforming toxic leaders, California: Stanford University Press.
Harris, K. J., Harvey, P. & Kacmar, K. M. (2011). Abusive supervisory reactions to coworker relationship conflict. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1010–1023.
Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W. & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264–280.
Ho, H, X; Le A, N. (2020).Investigating the relationship between benevolent leadership and the organizational citizenship behavior of academic staff: The mediating role of leader-member exchange, Management in Education1–11;DOI: 10.1177/0892020620980000
Hossam, M. Abu.E. (2008). An investigation of the relationship of openness to experience and organizational citizenship behavior, journal of American academy of business, Vol. 13, No.1, pp72-78.
Iqbal, S., Farid, T., Jianhong, M., Khattak, A., & Nurunnabi, M. (2018). The Impact of Authentic Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behaviours and the Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Banking Sector of Pakistan. Sustainability, 10(7), 2170.
Jeremy Brees, Jeremy Mackey, Mark Martinko and Paul Harvey. (2014).The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Abusive Supervision in the Relationship Between Personality and Aggression. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 2014 21: 403 originally published.
Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse at work: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1, 85-95.
Keashly, L., & Harvey, S. (2005). Emotional abuse in the workplace, In: S. Fox, & P. Spector (Eds), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. (pp. 201-235). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Keashly, L., Trott, V. & MacLean, L. M. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence & Victims, 9(4), 341-357.
Kernodle, T. A. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of organizational citizenship behavior:a hierarchical iinear modeling study.Atesis to the faculty of the college of business administration for the degree of philosophy in business administration.
Khan, S. N., Qureshi, I. M. & Ahmad, H. I. (2010). Abusive supervision and negative employee outcomes. European journal of social sciences, 15(4), 490-500.
Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G. & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review,integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1308–1338.
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived organizational support a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, doi:10.1177/0149206315575.
Lavelle, J. J., Brockner, J., Konovsky, M. A., Price, K. H., Henley, A. B., Taneja, A., & Vinekar, V. (2009). Commitment, procedural fairness, and organizational citizenship behavior: A multi foci analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 337-357.
Leisink, P. & Steijn, B. (2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1): 35-52.
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The Nature and Dimensionality of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 52–65.
Lian, H. W., Ferris, D. L. & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 41–52.
Liu, X. Y. & Wang, J. (2013). Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behavior: Is supervisor subordinate guanxi a mediator?. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), 1471– 1489.
Liu, Y., & Cohen, A. (2010). Values, commitment, and OCB among Chinese employees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34: 493-506.
Lopez- Dominguez, M., Enache, M., Sallan, J. M., & Simo, P. (2013). Transformational leadership as an antecedent of change- oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66 (10), 2147-2152.
Maccoby, M. (2000). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 68-78.
Maccoby, M. (2003). The productive narcissist: The promise and peril of visionary leadership, NY: Broadway Books.
Maria Khalid;Sajid Bashir;Abdul Karim Khan;Nida Abbas. (2018). When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors An Islamic work ethics perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal,Vol. 39 No. 6, 2018,pp. 794-806.
Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R. & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), 120–137.
Mitchell, M. S. & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168.
Moon, T. W., Hur, W. M., & Jun, J. K. (2013). The role of perceived organizational support on emotional labor in the airline industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(1): 105–123.
MoshrefJavadi, M. H; Yavarian, J. (2011). Efeect of organizational identity and commitment on organizational citizenship behavior(Case study: Educational department of Isfahan province; Journal of contemporary Reserch In Business, 3: 2.
O'Brien, L., Berry, H. & Hogan, A. (2012). The structure of psychological life satisfaction: insights from farmers and a general community sample in Australia. BMC Public Health, 12, 976 – 986.
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176-194.
Piko, B. F. & Hamvai, C. (2010). Parent, school and peer-related correlates of adolescents' life satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1479-1482.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, B. S., Puine, B. J., & Bachrach, G. D. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and Empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3): 513 - 563.
Pooja, A. A., Clercq, D. A., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2016). Job Stressors and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of Organizational Commitment and Social Interaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2016: 1-33.
Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. & Folger, R. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiplemediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1513–1534.
Qiu Shaoping, Amin Alizadeha, Larry M. Dooleya, Ruijuan Zhang(2019) The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior, and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 40, 77–87.
Rafferty, A. E. & Restubog, S. L. D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 270–285.
Restubog, S. L. D., Scott, K. L. & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 713–729.
Roberson, M. E. B. Strickland, Oriel. (2010). The Relationship Between Charismatic Leadership, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 144(3), 313–326.
Rurkkhum, S., & Bartlett, K. R. (2012). The relationship between employee engagement and organizational citizenship behavior in Thailand. Human Resource Development International, 15: 157-174.
Sadeghi Afjeh, Saeedeh (2014). A Study of the Relationship between the Components of Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Case Study of Tehran District 8 Municipality) Master's Thesis. Islamic Azad university. (in persian).
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J. & Ensley, M. D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 455–465.
Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E. & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169–1180.
Van Dyne, L. Graham, L. and Dienesh, R. (1994). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation, Acadamy Of Management Journal, 37:4, 755-772.
Vigoda. Gadot, E. (2006). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in workplace. Journal of Business and Psychologe, 21:3, 377-405.
Vincent, Rousseau;Caroline,Aube. (2016).When Leaders Stifle Innovation in Work Teams: The Role of Abusive Supervision, Bus Ethics,DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3258-8
Wilson-Starks, K. Y. (2003). Toxic leadership. Transleadership, Inc.
Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K. & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of lmx. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 531–543.
zare, A., hadavinejad, M., Ramezan, M. (2018). Exploring the Consequences of Abusive Supervision Using Interpretative Structural Modeling Approach. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 7(3), 149-184 (in persian).
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J. & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068–1076.