نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (آمیخته)

نویسنده

دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، مدرس گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، اردبیل، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر پیامدهای انتخاب دانشجو در دانشگاه فرهنگیان است که به روش آمیخته انجام شده است. در این پژوهش در بخش کیفی از تکنیک دلفی استفاده شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل اساتید دانشگاه فرهنگیان در پردیس‌های واقع در سه استان آذربایجان غربی، شرقی و اردبیل به تعداد 550 نفر است؛ که در مرحله کیفی 27 نفر از طریق نمونه‌گیری هدفمند در دسترس و در مرحله کمی 227 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش در بخش کیفی مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود که از روش بازخورد مشارکت‌کننده برای اعتبارسنجی آن استفاده شد و در بخش کمی از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شد که مقادیر میانگین واریانس استخراج‌شده (AVE) در تمامی مؤلفه‌ها بزرگ‌تر از مقدار 7/0 است. بنابراین پایایی پرسشنامه پژوهش مورد تائید است. برای تحلیل داده‌های کیفی از روش کدگذاری و برای تحلیل داده‌های کمی از مدل معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار PLS نسخه 3 استفاده شد. بر اساس یافته‌های بخش کیفی مهم‌ترین عوامل مؤثر بر پیامدهای انتخاب دانشجو در دانشگاه فرهنگیان عبارت‌اند از انتخاب فرایند محور، معیارهای انتخاب، ابزارهای انتخاب. نتایج بخش کمی نشان می‌دهد که مدل ساختاری موردبررسی از کیفیت مناسبی برخوردار است و مقادیر مشاهده‌شده خوب بازسازی‌شده‌اند و مدل موردبررسی توانایی پیش‌بینی بالایی دارد و می‌تواند متغیر مکنون درون‌زا را پیش‌بینی نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and analyzing the factors affecting the outcomes of student selection in Farhangian University

نویسنده [English]

  • Azimeh Motekalem

PhD in Educational Management, Lecturer of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Ardabil, Iran

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study is to identify and analyze the factors affecting the outcomes of student selection in Farhangian University, which has been done in a mixed method. Delphi technique has been used in the qualitative part in this research. The statistical population of the study includes 550 professors of Farhangian University in the campuses located in three provinces of West and East Azarbayjan, and Ardabil. 27 persons were available through purposeful sampling in the qualitative stage, and 227 persons were chosen through cluster sampling in the quantitative stage. The research tool was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative part, which was validated by means of the participant's feedback method. In the quantitative part, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. Average values of extracted variances (AVE) in all components are higher than 0.7. Therefore, the reliability of the research questionnaire is confirmed. Coding method was used for qualitative data analysis, and structural equation modeling was used for quantitative data analysis using PLS version 3 software. Based on the findings of the qualitative department, the most important factors affecting the consequences of student selection in Farhangian University are: process-based selection, selection criteria, and selection tools. The results of the quantitative section show that the studied structural model is of good quality and the observed values are well reconstructed and the studied model has a high predictive ability which can predict the endogenous latent variable.
Introduction
Education is the foundation of social, economic, political and cultural development of any society and has the greatest impact on the promotion of society in various dimensions. Any fundamental change in society requires the transformation of the educational system of that society and the main axis of development of any educational system is the quality of teacher performance (Nazarpour, 2017). Formal education has been an inclusive system since the beginning of this century, first in advanced societies and then in all developing societies, and today there is no society in which this system has no role in its evolution and development (Golshan, 2018). But what is most important among the various teacher education programs is the issue of attracting and selecting the right people. This issue has always been important in the educational systems of most developed countries and has been prioritized in their educational programs (Soleymani & Motakallem & Namvar, 2021). In Finland, for example, the selection of qualified people for the teaching profession is a complex process, and the selection of these people takes place with ultimate precise. (Garbe & Shiel & Sulkunen, 2017). However, despite the importance of this issue, there are always disagreements about the process of selecting the right people, and these different perspectives should be benefitted to form a suitable program to select the right people (Kitchen & Petrarca, 2016). Undoubtedly, universities and teacher training centers are places that must use appropriate and sufficient criteria to select the right people from among the various candidates. If they refuse to play their role, the quality of selected individuals and even future teachers can not be guaranteed (Raths & Lyman, 2009). In any country, providing the favorable condition to achieve the positive and applicable results in the process of students' learning involves special attention to the process of selecting and training candidates to enter the profession of teaching in teacher training centers. Groundwater-Smit Mockler, 2009). Given the above, the process of selecting the right people to enter teacher training centers is of particular importance in the education system, and it seems that this issue has been neglected in the studies of researchers in the country. Therefore, the present study focuses on this main issue and seeks to answer the following questions:

What are the factors affecting the consequences of student selection in Farhangian University?
What are the most important factors in choosing the right student in Farhangian University?
To what extent do these factors affect the outcome of student selection at Farhangian University?

Theoretical framework
Selecting the right people for the teaching profession is a step to accept or reject the applications of applicants for the teaching profession so that the most suitable and appropriate ones are selected. (Mirsepasi, 2015) The conditions for selecting the right people are the criteria and indicators individuals volunteering for the teaching profession must meet. In Unesco's manifest (UNESCO, 2017) concerning the "teacher training", the teacher is introduced as the axis and center of learning, and having effective and skillful teachers is considered the right of every child in the world, which is conditioned on the careful selection of interested and capable people to enter the profession. In this manifest, the selection of the appropriate teachers for the learners is introduced as one of the main factors in growth and development of the educational systems (Soleymani & Motakallem & Namvar, 2021). Mahdavi Hazaveh et al. (2017) in a study entitled "Good life, a perspective for children" while highlighting the importance and position of teachers in society, showed Given the position of this job in society, a teacher requires special qualifications, and certainly those involved in this field must be careful in choosing the right people to enter this sacred profession. Ragnarsdóttir & Jóhannesson (Ragnarsdóttir & Jóhannesson, 2014) in their study entitled, have investigated the admission process in Iceland. According to this research, due to the limited admission capacity to select the right people, each institution and center has defined some approximate criteria for itself, but what is common among all teacher training centers in this country includes criteria such as work experience, participate in social organizations and activities in them, having and cooperating in related and additional training (Nazarpour, 2017).
Methodology
The present study uses a mixed and exploratory design in which qualitative and quantitative data are collected and analyzed. In this research, Delphi technique has been used in the qualitative part. The present study began with the collection and analysis of qualitative data in which the most important factors affecting the consequences of student selection in Farhangian University were identified through interviews and three stages including open, axial and selective coding from the perspective of participants. In the second step, quantitative data were collected and analyzed. The statistical population of the study is 550 professors and lecturers of Farhangian University in the campuses of three provinces of West, East and Ardabil in 1399, of which 27 persons were available through purposeful sampling in the qualitative stage, and 227 persons in the quantitative stage by Cluster sampling were selected. The data collection tool was semi-structured in the qualitative stage of the interview. In order to collect quantitative data, a researcher-made questionnaire from the qualitative section of 35 questions was used. Structural equation model with PLS software was used to analyze the quantitative data.
Discussion and Results
Based on the findings of the qualitative department, the most important factors affecting the consequences of student selection in Farhangian University are: process-based selection, selection criteria, and selection tools. The results of the quantitative section show that the studied structural model is of good quality and the observed values are well reconstructed and the studied model has a high predictive ability and can predict the endogenous latent variable.
Process-based selection elements, selection criteria, and selection tools can explain 43.3% of the variance of outcomes, which is significant. Also, the value for the outcome variable is equal to 0.508, which is considered strong. Therefore, it can be said that the studied structural model is of good quality and the observed values are well reconstructed and the studied model has a high predictive ability and can predict the endogenous latent variable.
Conclusion
The aim of this study was to identify and analyze the factors affecting the outcomes of student selection in Farhangian University. The findings of the qualitative section showed that the most important factors affecting the consequences of student selection in Farhangian University from the perspective of research participants are: process-based selection, selection criteria, and selection tools; each composed of subcomponents. From the perspective of research participants, one of the most important factors affecting the consequences of optimal student selection is process-based selection. Intelligence measuring, mental abilities, communication skills, having the right articulation, skills related to creativity and writing, having the spirit of teamwork and participation, and having the right emotional and personality traits are the most important criteria for choosing a good student in Farhangian University according to the perspective of research participants. Canadian experts, including Caskey et al. (2001), believe that this tool can motivate volunteers, show their true quality, and demonstrate volunteer's communication skills. Therefore, favorable strategies for selecting students in Farhangian University have desirable consequences for the educational system, and, training and employment through the selection of qualified people leads to the development of the educational system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Selection
  • a would-be teacher student
  • Farhangian University
  • Consequences
Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2006). Innovations in teacher education: A social constructivist approach. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Casey, C. E., & Childs, R. A. (2007). Teacher education program admission criteria and what beginning teachers need to know to be successful teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 67, 1 – 23. Retrieved from http://umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/
Caskey, M. M., Peterson, K. D., & Temple, J. B. (2001). Complex admission selection procedures for a graduate pre-service program. Teacher EducationQuarterly, 28(4), 7-21. Retrieved fromhttp://www.teqjournal.org/backvols/2001/28_4/v28n4_02.pdf
Cochran-Smith, M. (2010). Toward a theory of teacher education for social justice. In A. Hargreaves, M. Fullan, A. Lieberman, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change(2nd ed., pp. 445–467). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Cresswell, John (2012). Qualitative scan, translated by Hassan Danaeifard, Tehran: Saffar Publications.
DeLuca, C. (2012). Selecting inclusive teacher candidates; Validity and reliability issues in admission policy and practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(4), 7-31.
 Dore, K. L., Reiter, H. I., Eva, K. W., Krueger, S., Scriven, E., Siu, E., Hilsden, S., Thomas, J., & Norman, G. R. (2009). Extending the interview to all medical school candidates: Computer-based multiple sample evaluation of noncognitive skills (CMSENS). Academic Medicine, 84, 9-12.
 Ministry of Education(2012), Iran,Tehran. Fundamental Reform Document of Education
Garbe C, Lafontaine D, Shiel G, Sulkunen S (2017). Literacy in Finland: Country report. Children and adolescents. European Literacy Policy Network (ELINET).
Ghadampour, E & Alaei Kharaim, R (2015). Phenomenological study on students' experience of the student admission process in Farhangian University, Proceedings of the Second National Conference and the Ninth Conference on Quality Assessment of University Systems, Tehran: Farhangian University. (In Persian)
Gitomer, D. H. (2007). Teacher quality in a changing policy landscape: Improvements in the teacher pool. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Golshan Foumani, M. R (2018). Sociology of Education. Tehran: Doran Publishing, Fourteenth Edition. (In Persian)
Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Hirschkorn, M., & Sears, A. (2015). More than gatekeeping: The pedagogical potential of admissions procedures for teacher education. In L. Thomas & M. Hirschkorn (Eds.), Change and progress in Canadian teacher education: Research on recent innovations in teacher preparation in Canada (pp. 441-463). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association for Teacher Education.
Johnson, G., & Howell, A. (2009). Change in pre-service teacher attitudes toward contemporary issues in education. International Journal of Special Education, 24, 35–41.
Kitchen, J. & Petrarca, D. (2016). Teacher education in Ontario: On the cusp of change. In T. Falkenberg (Ed.), Handbook of Canadian teacher education research: Initial teacher education (pp. 62-76). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association for Teacher Education.
Kossana,N. (2013). National Science Education standards and preserviceprograms in the USA. Journal of Curriculum studies (J.C.S)7 (27), 21-44.
 Kosnik, C., Brown, R., & Beck, C. (2005). The preservice admissions process: What qualities do future teachers need and how can they be identified in applicants? The New Educator, 1, 101–123. doi: 10.1080/15476880590932210.
Mahdavi Hazaveh, M,. Maleki, H,.Mehr Mohammadi, M,. Abbaspour, A. (2017) Hayat Taybeh, a perspective for raising children. Research in Islamic Education Issues, Year 24, New Volume, Number 30.139-167. (In Persian)
Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2015) Evaluating the quality of the university through the experience of output quality (comprehensive test). Proceedings of the Second National Conference and the Ninth Conference on Quality in University Systems, Tehran, Farhangian University. (In Persian)
 Mirsepasi, N. (2015). Strategic management of human resources and labor relations, with a view to the process of globalization. Tehran: Mir. (In Persian)
Nazarpour, M. T. (2017) Architecture of learning environments based on the document of fundamental transformation of education. Quarterly Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems. Volume 11 Number 2 (21 consecutive), pp. 229-209. (In Persian)
 Ragnarsdóttir, G. & Jóhannesson, I.A. (2014). Curriculum, crisis and the work and well-being of Icelandic upper secondary school teachers. Education Inquiry, 5 (1), 43-67.
 Raths, J., & Lyman, F. (2003). Summative evaluation of student teachers: An enduring problem. Journal o f Teacher Education, 54(3), 206-216.
Richter, M.; Klusman, U.; Ludtke, D. & Baument, J. (2011).Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher education, 21 (1), 116 -126.
 Silbeck, M. (2018) ‘Lawrence Stenhouse: Research methodology’. British Educational Research Journal 9:1, 11–20.
Stenhouse, L. (2016) ‘Product or process? A reply to Brian Crittenden’, reprinted in Ruddock, J. and Hopkins, D. (eds) (1985) Research as a Basis for Teaching. London, Heinemann Educational.UNESCO. (2014). World teachers day. Available at: www.unesco.org.
Soleymani,T & Motakallem,A & Namvar,Y(2021) Comparative study of student-teacher selection criteria in teacher training centers in South Korea, Japan, Canada, Finland and Iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies 2, Spring and Summer, 12 issues,69-272. (In Persian)
UNESCO. (2017). World teachers day. Available at: www.unesco.org