طراحی الگوی هنرآفرینی شغلی اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کیفی )

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتـری، گـروه مدیربت بازرگانی ، دانشـکده کسب و کار و اقتصاد ، دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر،ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده کسب و کار و اقتصاد ، دانشگاه خلیج فارس ، بوشهر، ایران

چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف طراحی الگویی برای هنرآفرینی شغلی در میان اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه خلیج فارس انجام شد. پژوهش از نوع کیفی و مبتنی بر نظریه داده‌محور است و داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته با ۱۷ عضو هیئت علمی جمع‌آوری گردید. نمونه‌گیری به روش گلوله‌برفی انجام شده و تحلیل داده‌ها به روش نظریه داده‌محور استراوس و کوربین با رویکرد انتخابی و محوری صورت پذیرفت. برای تضمین پایایی و روایی، داده‌ها از نظر نخبگان بررسی شد و کدگذاری توسط دو پژوهشگر مستقل انجام گرفت. یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که الگوی پیشنهادی شامل ۵۸ مفهوم کلیدی است که در ۵ دسته اصلی پیشایندها، راهبردها، عوامل مداخله‌گر، دلایل زمینه‌ای و پسایندها طبقه‌بندی می‌شوند. این الگو نشان می‌دهد که هنرآفرینی شغلی منجر به ارتقای فردی و حرفه‌ای اعضای هیئت علمی، افزایش خلاقیت، انگیزه و بهره‌وری در محیط دانشگاهی می‌شود. نتایج پژوهش می‌تواند در سیاست‌گذاری و مدیریت دانشگاه‌ها برای ایجاد شرایط مناسب جهت تقویت هنرآفرینی شغلی و ارتقای کیفیت آموزش و پژوهش مؤثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Designing a Job Crafting Model for Faculty Members

نویسندگان English

najmeh taheri 1
Ebrahim Rajabpour 2
1 PhD student, Department of Business Management, School of Business and Economics, Persian Gulf University,1 Bushehr, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, School of Business and Economics, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract
This study was carried out with the purpose of creating a job crafting model for the faculty members of Persian Gulf University. This research is qualitative in and based on the data-driven theory and the data were collected through a series of semi-structured interviews with 17 faculty members. For sampling, the snowball sampling method was utilized, and the data analysis was conducted using Strauss and Corbin’s grounded theory with a focus on a selective and pivotal approach. In order to better validate and ensure reliability, the data were reviewed by peers and experts, and coding was conducted by two independent researchers. Our findings also show that our proposed model includes 58 key concepts, which can be categorized into five main groups, including antecedents, strategies, intervening factors, underlying causes, and consequences. This model indicated that job crafting leads to both personal and the professional development of faculty members. Furthermore, job crafting increases creativity, motivation, and productivity within the academic environment. The results of this study can aid university policy-making as well as the management by contributing to the creation of agreeable conditions for enhancing job crafting and improving the quality of education and research.
Introduction
In an unstable working environment, employees’ skills, creativity and proactive job changes play a pivotal role when it comes to organizational innovation and survival (Dewi & Harahap, 2024). Therefore, researchers emphasize the importance of designing flexible jobs where employees have the ability to proactively change their roles and tasks (Zhang & Parker,2019). Job crafting refers to the countless ways through which employees can alter and personalize their jobs (Weisman et al,2022). Job crafting is a rather unorthodox concept that challenges our traditional view of human resource and our knowledge regarding job design. Job crafting in an academic setting can be characterized by the active redesign of roles by employees to better align with their abilities and personal preferences. Job crafting can play a functional role in enhancing job satisfaction, well-being, and productivity, and is reinforced by a supportive learning environment and effective leadership (Melhem & Yakoub, 2023). With this being said, universities, as institutions which hold pivotal roles in development, play a fundamental role in advancing the scientific and social growth of communities by relying on faculty members as key human resources (Mehmood & Noureen, 2024). Recent studies also indicate that the human capital of faculty members is closely related to different aspects of their jobs, and its development is crucial for the success of universities.
Emphasizing on compensation, especially when it comes to non-financial aspects, plays a key role in maintaining and enhancing human capital.
Therefore, designing a job crafting model can help with improving faculty performance, enhancing the quality of higher education, as well as promoting sustainable development. For instance, a study by (Melhem & Yakoub,2023) examined the antecedent and consequences of job changes in an academic setting and revealed that supportive learning environments coupled up with learning-enhancing leadership have a positive impact on job crafting, which as a result leads to faculty job satisfaction. Despite numerous international studies, comprehensive research on designing a job crafting model for faculty members has yet to be conducted in Iran; this study aims to fill this gap by identifying the key elements of the model through a literature review. The findings of this study can help policy makers, universities and even faculty members to better leverage opportunities to enhance job crafting. Based on this, the present research seeks to answer the question: What does the job crafting model of university faculty members in Iran look like?
Theoretical Framework
Job Crafting Among University Faculty Members
Higher education institutions, because of their focus on delivering high quality services, are heavily interested in maintaining their faculty members' commitment to help enhance performance and promote progress (Oppong & Oduro-Asabere, 2025; McNaughtan et al., 2022). This tendency is particularly supported by the notion that faculty members tend to show greater loyalty to their field of study and profession rather than to the institution in which they serve (Lawrence et al, 2012). Job crafting in university professors leads to increased work engagement as well as performance. Using role expansion strategies as well as social communication strategies enhances faculty members’ commitment and social service behavior (Ortega-Egea et al, 2024). Faculty members can participate in their job redesign by utilizing task strategies, relational strategies, and cognitive strategies, and due to the professional nature of their work, they usually possess high levels of job autonomy (Grant et al,2017). Job crafting can also have positive effects on work engagement and help better facilitate participative behaviors and work interaction through increased autonomy and task independence (Baka & Prusik, 2025). The findings also emphasize the significance of job crafting as an effective strategy for enhancing job satisfaction as well as well-being among university faculty members. Through the active modification of tasks and roles, supported by a conducive learning environment and effective leadership, this process also contributes to increased productivity. This process can also increase productivity through actively altering tasks and roles and the support by a conducive learning environment and effective leadership (Melhem & Al-Yakoub,2023).
A study by (Ortega-Egea et al,2024) examines how utilizing approach and avoidance strategies in faculty members' job crafting can have results on humanitarian behaviours. Results indicate that approach strategies enhance humanitarian behavior, while avoidance strategies have a negative impact on humanitarian behaviour. Furthermore, job commitment plays a critical mediating role, which can help better highlight the importance of supporting faculty members to strengthen their commitment and service-oriented behavior.
Methodology
This study is qualitative and is also based on the grounded theory approach, which is designed to develop native (domestic) theories from field data. Furthermore, the data were collected through 17 semi-structured interviews with faculty members at Persian Gulf University. For the sampling, the purposive and snowball methods were utilized, and data analysis was performed through open, axial, and selective coding based on Strauss and Corbin’s method, with the MaxQDA 2020 software. To help ensure the study’s validity and reliability, independent coding by two researchers as well as text reviews, and careful supervision of the analysis process was performed.
Research Findings
The present study utilized the grounded theory method, and was performed in four stages: At first, the data were collected through a set of semi-structured interviews which were executed with 17 faculty members at Persian Gulf University. Then, through open, axial, and selective coding, 880 initial concepts were categorized into 58 subcategories and ultimately into 5 main categories. These five main categories include career growth, innovation, culture, and performance improvement. In the following stages, the relationships between units were thoroughly analyzed and a theoretical framework was then developed. Furthermore, the demographic characteristics of the sample were examined to provide a comprehensive framework for faculty job crafting.
Conclusion
The present study was completed in order to create a job crafting model for faculty members. The findings, presented in this study is in line with several other studies, namely (Almasradi et al., 2022; Laguía et al., 2024; Ortega-Egea et al., 2024) (Melhem & Yakoub, 2023) and (Mukherjee & Dhar, 2022) (Grant et al,2017; Melhem,2019) (Rózsa et al,2023; Mülder et al, 2022; Almasradi et al, 2022)). Job crafting can be viewed as an innovative approach to redefining professional roles and responsibilities. By utilizing individual capabilities and creativity, job crafting plays a critical role in improving the quality of educational and research performance of faculty members. Unlike traditional job designing models, through fostering self-management, self-motivation, and active interaction with the organizational environment, job crafting enables creative job redesigning. Furthermore, this study also indicates that job crafting is influenced by predecessors such as individual characteristics, motivations, professional capabilities, social culture and values, and lastly organizational environment. Additionally; this study also indicated that job crafting faces challenges such as psychological, structural, financial, and cultural ones. Moreover, Contextual factors such as organizational structure, culture, management, training, resources, and technology play a key role in advancing or hindering this process. Various strategies such as structural changes, training, teamwork, motivation, and resource support can have positive effects on developing job crafting. This process can have several positive outcomes, such as career growth, improved service quality, personal and organizational development, satisfaction and motivation between faculty members, mental health and scientific progress. Faculty members play a pivotal role in scientific progress and improving educational quality as the foundations of the academic system and in order to attain sustainable development, it is necessary to provide practical solutions to improve their performance. The present study offers several suggestions such as developing educational programs, creating supportive environments, providing financial resources, continuous evaluation, encouraging innovation, and strengthening connections with industry in order to improve academic quality. Moreover, this study also names factors such as interdisciplinary collaborations and connections with the labor market to help facilitate innovation and the adaptation of education. Despite setbacks such as a small sample group and geographic focus, this study stressed the fact that career creativity is essential for improving educational quality, job satisfaction, and sustainable development of both universities and society. Lastly, this study suggests for future studies to be conducted, especially in the field of new technologies.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Job Analysis
Scientific and Cultural Development
Human Resource Management
Job Crafting
Albats, E., Bogers, M., & Podmetina, D. (2020). Companies’ human capital for university partnerships: A micro-foundational perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120085
Almasradi, R. B., Anjum, T., Shams, F., & Iqbal, E. H. (2022). Effect of Job Crafting on Faculty’s Job Satisfaction and Performance; The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Research in Psychology, 4(2), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.31580/jrp.v4i2.2709
Baka, Ł., & Prusik, M. (2025). The more engaged you are, the hardier you become: Investigating the cross-lagged mediational effect of job crafting on the work engagement–hardiness link. Personality and Individual Differences, 237, 113058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113058
Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596
De la Croix, D., Docquier, F., Fabre, A., & Stelter, R. (2023). Are scholars’ wages correlated with their human capital? Repertorium Eruditorum Totius Europae, 10, 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.14428/rete.v10i0/wages.
Dewi, R. P., & Harahap, D. H. (2024). The Role Of Job Crafting Towards Readiness For Change Among Millennial Employees. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 11136-11148. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i1.9180
Grant, A. M., Fried, Y., Parker, S. K., & Frese, M. (2010). Putting job design in context: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 145-157. DOI: 10.1002/job.679
Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2017). Re-crafting careers for mid-career faculty: A qualitative study. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(5). http://www.m.www.na-businesspress.com/JHETP/GrantValloneEJ_17_5_.pdf
Hajdarpasic, A., Brew, A., & Popenici, S. (2015). The contribution of academics’ engagement in research to undergraduate education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 644–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842215
ornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top‐down and bottom‐up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 187-215. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/job.625
Hu, X., Lv, Y., Tan, M., & Hao, B. (2024). Influence of early childhood teachers' psychological contracts on teacher competency: Chain mediating role of job crafting and professional identity. Heliyon, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29130
Kalyan, V. S., Manjula, S., Kondeti, C., Padma, T. M., Suresh, S., & Pratap, K. V. N. R. (2018). “Making our Job Hospitable”–Assessment of Job-Crafting Behavior among Dental Academic Faculty in South India. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry, 16(2), 149-153. https://journals.lww.com/aphd/toc/2018/16020
Laguía, A., Topa, G., Pocinho, R. F. D. S., & Muñoz, J. J. F. (2024). Direct effect of personality traits and work engagement on job crafting: a structural model. Personality and Individual Differences, 220, 112518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112518
Lawrence, J., M. Ott, and A. Bell. )2012(. “Faculty Organizational Commitment and Citizenship.” Research in Higher Education 53 (3): 325–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9230-7.
Mehmood, H., & Noureen, A. (2024). Understanding the Role of Job Crafting among University Faculty: A Qualitative Inquiry. Jinnah Business Review, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.53369/QLQL3328
McNaughtan, J., Thacker, R., Eicke, D., & Freeman, S. (2022). Committed to their craft: Understanding the relationship between job crafting and work commitment among faculty in the United States. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(2), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12293
Melhem, Y., & Al-Yakoub, T. (2023). Job Crafting Antecedents and Consequences: Evidence from Jordanian Universities. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.21.3.2986
Melhem, Y. S. (2019). The impact of job crafting on work engagement: evidence from Jordanian universities. Middle East Journal of Management, 6(5), 513-535.ocused job crafting. https://doi.org/10.1504/MEJM.2019.101920.
Mukherjee, T., & Dhar, R. L. (2023). Unraveling the black box of job crafting interventions: A systematic literature review and future prospects. Applied Psychology, 72(3), 1270-1323. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/apps.12434
Mülder, L. M., Schimek, S., Werner, A. M., Reichel, J. L., Heller, S., Tibubos, A. N., ... & Rigotti, T. (2022). Distinct patterns of university students study crafting and the relationships to exhaustion, well-being, and engagement. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 895930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895930
Oppong, N. Y., & Oduro-Asabere, N. (2025). Leadership talent development in higher educational institutions: Evidence from the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 113, 103196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103196
Ortega-Egea, T., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Cabeza-Pulles, D. (2024). Approach versus avoidance strategies in job crafting and their relationship to prosocial service behavior in university professors. Studies in Higher Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2330663
Rajabpour, E; Banafi, & M. (2021). Employees’ Job Creativity in State Banks. Iranian Journal of Public Management Studies, 4(3), 195-219. (in Persian). 10.22034/jipas.2022.264987.1141.
Rózsa, Z., Folvarčná, A., Holúbek, J., & Veselá, Z. (2023). Job crafting and sustainable work performance: A systematic literature review. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 717-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.023.
Shabani Bahar, Goodarzi, Mahmoud, Honari, Habib, Loghmani, & Mohsen. (2017). Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Effect of Job Creativity on Organizational Agility in Iran’s Ministry of Sports and Youth. Applied Research in Sports Management Quarterly, 5(3), 11-23. (in Persian). https://journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_3435_a74016f3102fddd9e46a5b832c76da74.pdf
Tavakoli, S. Shahr al-Din; Danayi, A. Abolazl; & Najafzadeh Shahr, M. R. (2021). Presenting a model of media strategies in the development of human resources in organizations using grounded theory. Journal of Human Resource Management in Industries, 12(48), 56. (in Persian). https://ensani.ir/fa/article/464245/
Tims, M., Twemlow, M., & Fong, C. Y. M. (2022). A state-of-the-art overview of job-crafting research: current trends and future research directions. Career Development International, 27(1), 54-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2021-0216.
Weisman, H., Bindl, U. K., Gibson, C. B., & Unsworth, K. L. (2022). It’s about time: Understanding job crafting through the lens of individuals’ temporal characteristics. Group & Organization Management, 47(2), 148-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221081586
Zahoor, A. )2018(. “Teacher Proactivity Influencing Student Satisfaction and Loyalty Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement.” Vikalpa 43 (3): 125–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090918785046
Zhang, F., & Parker, S. K. (2019). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of organizational behavior, 40(2), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2332
دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 28
تابستان 1405
صفحه 420-440

  • تاریخ دریافت 31 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 مرداد 1404