The relationship between cognitive dissonance, scientific reasoning and systemic thinking with the academic progress of Babol University physics students with the mediating role of critical thinking

Kamel Zaherolmahni, Akram; Hassani, Mohammad; Ghalavandi, Hasan

doi:10.22034/jmep.2024.434843.1310

The relationship between cognitive dissonance, scientific reasoning and systemic thinking with the academic progress of Babol University physics students with the mediating role of critical thinking

Document Type : Original Article (Quantified)

Authors

Akram Kamel Zaherolmahni ¹

Mohammad hassani ²

Hasan ghalavandi ³

¹ PhD student, Department of Educational Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

² Professor, Department of Educational Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

³ Professor, Educational Management Department, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/jmep.2024.434843.1310

Abstract

Abstract
The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between cognitive dissonance, scientific reasoning, and systemic thinking with the academic progress of Babol University physics students; with the mediating role of critical thinking. The current research is applicable in terms of purpose, and descriptive-correlative in terms of nature. The statistical population of the research includes 249 physics students; due to the limited statistical population, the statistical sample was considered equal to the statistical population, therefore, the census method was used and all the physics students of Babol University have been considered as the statistical sample of this research. As many as 249 questionnaires were distributed among students and consequently 230 questionnaires were returned. Four standard questionnaires of cognitive coordination (Harmon Jones et al., 2007), systemic thinking (Dolansky et al., 2020), scientific reasoning (Golombic et al., 2022), and critical thinking (Watson and Glaser, 2002) were used to collect research data; and, students' GPA was used in order to measure academic progress. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts in educational sciences and confirmatory factor analysis, and the reliability of the instrument was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient in a preliminary study. SPSS and Lisrel statistical software were used for data analysis. The results showed that there is a negative and significant relationship directly between cognitive dissonance and academic progress, with the mediating role of critical thinking. It was also found that there is a positive and significant relationship directly between systemic thinking and scientific reasoning with academic progress, with the mediating role of critical thinking.
Extended abstract
Introduction
One of the most important and central issues in the fields of scientific education is understanding the nature of science. This understanding plays a significant role in understanding the philosophy and goals of scientific education, the content of textbooks, teaching strategies, teacher preparation (with its characteristics), and also evaluating the results of teaching and learning; because understanding the nature of science helps teachers to design appropriate strategies for teaching. For example, the more the teacher's understanding and recognition of the nature of science increases, the more the teacher's method of using effective teaching methods increases. These methods make the student the center of the educational process. This process emphasizes understanding the spirit of science, styles, and methods. Also, if the professor is aware of the nature of science, it has positive effects on the quality of question design and its applications (Hamilton & Hamilton, 2018). Therefore, the most important task and goal of the lesson is to increase the understanding of the teacher and student about the nature of science (Stonebraker & Howard, 2018). Science is not just an accumulated collection of scientific information and facts that are categorized in various disciplines. Rather, it is a physical body of regular scientific knowledge that can be achieved by applying the scientific method. By scientific method, we mean a method that is based on discussion and research in natural phenomena. In other words, the scientific method is an inseparable part of science itself. Also, the understanding of science guides us to determine the concept of science as a process or method that leads us to a scientific knowledge that can reach the concept of the same science (Paloș et al, 2019). Academic progress is one of the most fundamental issues of any educational system; so that the level of academic progress of students is one of the basic indicators of evaluating an educational system and the level of success in its scientific activities. According to the issues raised, this research tries to examine the question of whether there is a significant relationship between cognitive dissonance, scientific reasoning, and systemic thinking with the academic progress of physics students at Babol University with the mediating role of critical thinking.
Theoretical Framework
Cognitive dissonance
Cognitive dissonance is a psychological model that refers to specific ideologies and mental processes that manifest the fundamental empirical structures of goal reliance and emphasis on balance (Li et al, 2022).

Scientific arguement
A scientific argument is an attempt to prove a fact, which usually includes a claim that may be supported by data, judgments, hypotheses, or descriptors (Saberi, 2018).
Systematic thinking
Systemic thinking in the general sense includes a large and countless set of methods, tools and principles, all of which focus on the mutual relationships between forces and seeing them in the heart of a single process (Rahmatollahi, 2020).
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking enables a person to investigate the truth during the confusion of events and information and achieve his goal, which is to reach the most complete understanding possible (Razavi & Nematifar, 2018).
Academic progress
The academic progress of the learners of any educational system indicates the success and efficiency of that system in realizing its goals and plans (Watson et al, 2021).
Sabih Mahdi & Ghalavandi (2024) investigated the effect of learning and motivational strategies on the self-efficacy of physical education and sports science students with the mediating role of academic progress and enthusiasm. The results showed that the effect of learning and motivational strategies, academic achievement goals and academic enthusiasm on students' academic self-efficacy was positive and significant; it was also found that the mediating role of academic achievement goals and academic enthusiasm in the effect of learning and motivational strategies on academic self-efficacy was positive and significant.
Li & Zhang (2023) investigated the cognitive/emotional dissonance of English language learners in content-based foreign language teaching: an ecological perspective. It was found that the cognitive/emotional inconsistency of English language learners in content-based foreign language education leads to learning decline and academic failure.
Research methodology
The current research is applicable in terms of purpose, and descriptive-correlative in terms of nature. The statistical population of the research includes 249 physics students; due to the limited statistical population, the statistical sample was considered equal to the statistical population, therefore, the census method was used and all the physics students of Babol University have been considered as the statistical sample of this research. As many as 249 questionnaires were distributed among students and consequently 230 questionnaires were returned. Four standard questionnaires of cognitive coordination (Harmon Jones et al., 2007), systemic thinking (Dolansky et al., 2020), scientific reasoning (Golombic et al., 2022), and critical thinking (Watson and Glaser, 2002) were used to collect research data; and, students' GPA was used in order to measure academic progress. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts in educational sciences and confirmatory factor analysis, and the reliability of the instrument was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient in a preliminary study.
Research findings
SPSS and Lisrel statistical software were used for data analysis. The results showed that there is a negative and significant relationship directly between cognitive dissonance and academic progress, with the mediating role of critical thinking. It was also found that there is a positive and significant relationship directly between systemic thinking and scientific reasoning with academic progress, with the mediating role of critical thinking.
Conclusion
The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the relationship between cognitive dissonance, scientific reasoning, and systemic thinking with the academic progress of Babol University physics students with the mediating role of critical thinking. The findings are in line with the results of Vashani et al., (2019), Schuessler et al., (2016), Pouratashi & Zamani (2017), Shafiei et al., (2018), Chen & Ji (2021), Vashani et al., (2019), Mohammadi et al., (2016), Schuessler et al., (2016), Zyhier (2023), Yazdanbakhsh (2017), Vashani et al., (2019), and Shafiei et al., (2018). Zyhier (2023) showed that the effect of cognitive retention on critical thinking is positive and significant.
In line with the obtained results, the following suggestions are presented:
1- It is suggested to provide an environment for students to plan their learning activities and have self-direction in learning, as well as to have a flexible learning environment so that students can have cognitive order and to reduce cognitive dissonance.
2- Strengthening inference and analysis skills in order to strengthen the spirit of criticism and questioning among students.

Keywords

Cognitive dissonance

Scientific reasoning

Systemic thinking

Academic progress

Critical thinking

Subjects

Education Management

Abdolmaleki, S., Mesrabadi, J., & Farid, A. (2015). Meta-analysis of the relationship between critical thinking and academic achievement indicators. Educational Leadership and Management Quarterly, 9(4): 62-43. https://civilica.com/doc/1847812. (In Persian)

Aboutalebi, H. (2021). The effect of academic motivation and academic seriousness on the academic achievement of female primary school students in District 7 of Karaj. Management and Educational Perspective, 2(4), 119-134. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2021.267311.1047. (In Persian)

Ashori, M., Bigdeki, M., Mohammadi, Z., & Sadri, K. (2016). Analyzing the relationship between educational procrastination and students' cognitive dissonance and learned helplessness, 3rd National School Psychology Conference. (In Persian)

Barta, S., & Gurrea, R., & Flavián, C. (2022). Using augmented reality to reduce cognitive dissonance and increase purchase intention, Computers in Human Behavior, 42: 1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107564

Bayat, F. (2019). Investigating the relationship between systemic thinking and the performance of principals of primary schools in Qarchak city, master's thesis in educational management, Tarbiat Debir Shahid Rajaei University. (In Persian)

Berndt, M., & Schmidt, F.M., & Zottmann, J.M. (2021). Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in medical-, social sciences-, and economics students, Learning and Individual Differences, 86:1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101963

Bhaw, N., & Kriek, J., & Lemmer, M. (2023). Insights from coherence in students’ scientific reasoning skills, Heliyon, 22: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17349

Chabrak, N., & Craig, R. (2013). Student imaginings, cognitive dissonance and critical thinking, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2011.07.008

Chen, R.S., & Ji, S. (2021). Investigating the relationship between thinking style and personal electronic device use and its implications for academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 52: 177-183. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.042

Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: fifty years of a classic theory. Los Angeles: Sage publications.

Dolansky, M. A., & Moore, S. M., & Palmieri, P. A., & Singh, M. K. (2020). Development and validation of the Systems Thinking Scale. Journal of general internal medicine, 35(8), 2314-2320. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05830-1

Gawronski, B. (2012), Back to the Future of Dissonance Theory: Cognitive Consistency as a Core Motive, Social Cognition, 30(Special Issue:Threat- Compensation in Social Psychology: Is There a Core Motivation?): 652-668.

Golumbic, Y.N., & Dalyot, K., & Barel, Y., & Keller, M. (2022). Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science. Public Understanding of Science. 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/09636625221098539

Hamilton, S.F;& Hamilton, M.A. (2018). School work, and emerging America: Coming of age in te 21 st century (PP.440-473). Washington, DC: American Psycholigical Association.

Harmon-Jones E., & Harmon-Jones C., & Fearn, M., & Sigelman, JD., & Johnson P. (2007). Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: tests of the action-based model of dissonance. J Pers Soc Psychol;94(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.1

Hossinmardi, A.A., & Ghorban Shirodi, Sh., & Zaribakhash, M.R., & Tizdastm T. (2021). The Relationship of Academic Engagement, School Engagement and School Belonging with Academic Achievement by Mediated the Academic Achievement Motivation in Male Students, Sociology of Education, 14(2):189-178. (In Persian)

Kamaei, A., & Weisani, M. (2013). The relationship between achievement motivation, critical thinking and creative thinking with academic performance, Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3(4): 121-127. http://www.cibtech.org/jls.htm.

Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Second Edition, New York: The Guilford Press.

Kroesen, M., Handy, S., & Chorus, C. (2017). Do attitudes cause behavior or vice versa? An alternative conceptualization of the attitude-behavior relationship in travel behavior modeling. Transportation Research Part. 101(1): 190-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.013.

Kuhn, D. (2002). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In: Goswami UC (ed.) Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell: 371– 393.

Lai, H.L., & Lee, Y.F., & Lai, K.C. (2020). The influence of humanised anatomical pedagogy on psychophysiological responses and academic achievement in nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36 (4): 245-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.11.005

Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2023). Exploring EFL learners' cognitive/emotional dissonance in content-based foreign language instruction: An ecological perspective, System, 25: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2023.103019

Li, Z.,& Wen, F., & Huang, Z.J. (2022). Asymmetric response to earnings news across different sentiment states: The role of cognitive dissonance, Journal of Corporate Finance, 41: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102343.

Liang, Y. J. (2016). Reading to make a decision or to reduce cognitive dissonance. The effect of selecting and reading online reviews from a post-decision context. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(1): 463-471. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.016

Luo, M., & Sun, D., & Zhou, L., & Yang, Y. (2021). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: Student performance and the interaction effects between grade level, gender, and academic achievement level, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41: 1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100899

McGarrah, M. W. (2015). Lifelong learning skills for college and career readiness: An annotated bibliography. College & career readness& success. Center at American Institutes for Research.

Mehramiz, S. (2016). The relationship between systemic thinking and irrational beliefs with the innovative behavior of primary school teachers in Birjand city, master's thesis in curriculum planning, Birjand University. (In Persian)

Miller, M.A.,& Malcolm, N.S. (2018).Critical thinking in the nursing curriculum. Nurs Health Care,11(2): 67-73.

Morvan, C., & O'Connor, A. J. (2017). An analysis of Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance. London: Macat International Ltd.

Nailya, B., & Anna, S., & Aida, N. (2015). Development of Systemic Way of Thinking in Contemporary Higher Education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 23: 1-6. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.599

Nejhadirani, F. (2017). Survey the Relationship Between Physicians Critical Thought With Patient’s Satisfaction Level in Sina Medical Center of Tabriz City. Educ Strategy Med Sci, 10 (1):42-50. (In Persian)

Nohi, E., & Salehi, S., & Sabzevari, S. (2014). The relationship between critical thinking and learning questions in graduate nursing students. Journal of Developmental Steps in Medical Education, 2(11): 186-179. (In Persian)

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse, Science, 22: 463-439. DOI: 10.1126/science.1183944

pali, S., & Tafazoli, S. (2021). Investigating the effect of educational technology equipment and teaching aids on the rate of promotion of sixth grade students in Rudsar. Management and Educational Perspective, 3(1), 1-29. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2021.243998.1031. (In Persian)

Paloș, R., & Maricuţoiu, P., & Costea, L. (2019). Relations between academic performance, student engagement and student burnout: A cross-lagged analysis of a two-wave study, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.01.005

Pouratashi, M., & Zamani, A. (2017). Measuring and investigating the relationship between thinking styles and goal orientation with students' academic performance. Educational Psychology Quarterly, 13(45): 59-81. https://doi.org/10.22054/jep.2017.8144. (In Persian)

Rahmatollahi, F. (2020). Investigating the effect of system thinking skills training on the academic performance of first secondary students in Taibad, master's thesis in educational technology, Islamic Azad University, Taibad branch. (In Persian)

Raymond, E. M. (2011). A sexual assault prevention program for men based on cognitive dissonance theory. University of Wyoming.

Razavi, S.A.M., & Nematifar, N. (2018). Cognitive skills of critical thinking in social network users (case study of Telegram social network). Media Studies, 13(1): 69-87. (In Persian)

Rimiene, V. (2014). Assessing and developing students' critical thinking. Psychology Learning and Teaching; 2(1): 17-22. DOI:10.2304/plat.2002.2.1.17

Saberi, M. (2018). Investigating the impact of teaching based on physics discourse on the physical reasoning ability of experimental 10th grade students, Master's Thesis in Curriculum Planning, Shahid Rajaee University of Education. (In Persian)

Sabih Mahdi, F., & ghalavandi, H. (2024). Investigating the mediating role of academic self-sufficiency and basic psychological needs in the relationship of social skills and social intelligence with academic achievement. Management and Educational Perspective, 6(1), 351-372. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2024.449918.1343. (In Persian)

Schuessler, H., & Kolomenski, A., & Bunker, P., & Perkins, C. (2016). Improving effectiveness of teaching large introductory physics courses with modern information technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228: 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.037

Shafiei, N., & Behrozi, N., & Shahaniyelagh, M., & Abolghasemi, M. (2018). The causal relationship between perception of constructive learning environment and Individual systemic thinking with tendency to lifelong learning, mediated by intrinsic motivation in undergraduate students of Shahid Chamran University of ahvaz. Educational Sciences, 25(2): 109-130. https://doi.org/10.22055/edu.2019.23512.2328. (In Persian)

Siyf, A.A. (2022). Modern educational psychology: psychology of learning and education. Duran Publications. (In Persian)

Stonebraker, I., & Howard, H, A. (2018). Evidence-based decision-making: awareness, process and practice in the management classroom, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(1): 113-117.

Takase, M., & Yoshida, I. (2021). The relationships between the types of learning approaches used by undergraduate nursing students and their academic achievement: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37 (5): 836-845. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs. 2021.06.005.

Vashani, A., & Mosavi, F., & Salari, Y. (2019). The role of creative thinking, analytical thinking and critical thinking in the academic progress of middle school students. Educational Journal, 14 (58): 162-140. https://civilica.com/doc/1623474. (In Persian)

Wahlström, B. (2018). Systemic thinking in support of safety management in nuclear power plants, Safety Science, 48: 1-7.

Watson, G., & Glaser, E. (2002). Watson- Glaser critical thinking appraisal, UK edition: practice test. Psychological Corporation.

Watson, P.W.S.J., & Sotardi, V. A., & Park, J., & Roy, D. (2021). Gender self-confidence, scholastic stress, life satisfaction, and perceived academic achievement for adolescent New Zealanders. Journal of Adolescence, 88: 120-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.02.009

Yardley, I. (2016). Cognitive dissonance: Conservation of the circle. Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.

Zadehsafari, S., & Alidad, F. (2020). Examining the academic progress of students. Journal of New Developments in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Education, 3 (32): 104-88. (In Persian)

Zyhier, S. (2023). Preparation strategies for the 2023 NCLEX next generation exam: Methods to improve organized critical thinking and cognitive retention, Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(5). 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2023.04.022