رابطه سواد اطلاعاتی با رشته تحصیلی دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد واحد مرودشت

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دکترای علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی ،عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور زاهدان،ایران

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین سواد اطلاعاتی و رشته تحصیلی انجام شد. روش پژوهش توصیفی همبستگی بود و جامعه آماری این مطالعه شامل دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت در چهار حوزه تحصیلی فنی و مهندسی، مدیریت و حسابداری، روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی و آموزش زبان انگلیسی به حجم 6500 نفر بودند. با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 363 دانشجو با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع آوری داده ها پرسشنامه سواد اطلاعاتی سیامک و داورپناه (2009) بود. یافته های این مطالعه نشان داد بین گروه روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی و مدیریت و حسابداری اختلاف معنی‌داری وجود دارد (05/0 > P) و میانگین در گروه روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی بالاتر از مدیریت و حسابداری بود. همچنین بین گروه فنی و مهندسی و مدیریت و حسابداری اختلاف معنی‌داری مشاهده شد (05/0 > P) و میانگین در گروه فنی و مهندسی بالاتر از مدیریت و حسابداری بود. در مابقی حوزه های تحصیلی تفاوت معنی‌داری مشاهده نشد. پیشنهاد می شود جهت ارتقای سطح سواد اطلاعاتی دانشجویان اقدام به برگزاری کارگاه هایی با هدف بالا بردن سواد رایانه ای و سواد کتابخانه ای دانشجویان و ترویج فرهنگ پژوهش محوری گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The relationship between information literacy and the field of study of students of Marvdasht Branch of Azad University

نویسنده [English]

  • Zahra Khajeh Ali Jahanteghi
PhD in Information Science, University of Payame Noor University, Zahedan University of Zahedan. Iran
چکیده [English]

The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between information literacy and field of study. The research method was descriptive-correlative and the statistical population of this study included students of Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch in four fields of technical and engineering education, management and accounting, psychology and educational sciences, and English language teaching with a volume of 6500 individuals. Using Cochran's formula, 363 students were selected by stratified random sampling. Data collection tools were Siamak and Davarpanah Information Literacy Questionnaire (2009). The findings of this study showed that there was a significant difference between the Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences and of Management and Accounting (P <0.05), and the average in the Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences was higher than that of management and accounting. There was also a significant difference between the technical and engineering group and management and accounting (P <0.05), and the average in the technical and engineering group was higher than that of management and accounting. There was no significant difference in the other areas of study. It is suggested that workshops with the aim of increasing computer literacy and library literacy of students and promoting research-oriented culture should be held in order to improve the level of information literacy of students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Students
  • Field of Study
  • Information Literacy
Ahmadi, M. (2018). Study of the Information literacy level in the Post Graduated Physical Education Student in South East Region. Communication Management in Sport Media, 5(4), 29-40. (In Persian).

Abbasi, E., najafloo, P. (2015). Assessment of Information Literacy of Agricultural Postgraduate Students at Tarbiat Modares University,Iran. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 7(34), 89-103. doi: 10.22092/jaear.2016.106009. (In Persian).

Çoklar, A. N., Yaman, N. D., & Yurdakul, I. K. (2017). Information literacy and digital nativity as determinants of online information search strategies. Computers in Human Behavior70, 1-9.

Esmaeili, A., Rahimi, S., Moradi, M. (2019). The relationship between information literacy and the ability of library users to spot fake news based on the components of IFLA infographic. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 30(1), 7-26. doi: 10.30484/nastinfo.2019.2304. (In Persian).

Guzmán-Simón, F., García-Jiménez, E., & López-Cobo, I. (2017). Undergraduate students’ perspectives on digital competence and academic literacy in a Spanish University. Computers in Human Behavior74, 196-204.

Jameson, J., & Walsh, M. E. (2017). Tools for evidence-based vascular nursing practice: Achieving information literacy for lifelong learning. Journal of Vascular Nursing35(4), 201-210.

Kaleem, M. M., & Zaheer, A. (2019). Measurement of Online User Information Literacy Satisfaction: An Empirical Study. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (1994-7046)27(1).

MarefatR., MansourianY., & ZerehsazM. (2018). Why Information Literacy Is Needed? A Qualitative Study about the VviewpointsS of Semnan University Psychology Students. Library and Information Science Research (LISRJ), 8(1), 197-220. (In Persian).https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v0i0.63307

Naderi, M., shahrabadi, E., Rezaeian, M., Hadavi, M. (2013). Evaluation of the Information Literacy of the Students at Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences in Year 2010. The Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 12(8):631-640. (In Persian).

Niknam Vaziveh, M., Khosravi, F., Talebi, S. (2014). A comparison of Information Literacy of Library & Information Science, and Information Technology MS Students at Tehran University. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 25(1), 160-173. (In Persian).

Qasmi،A. (2006). Check the status of graduate students information literacy and information literacy standards compliance, PhD thesis Librarian, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian).

Rader, H. (2019). Bibliographic instruction or information literacy. College & Research Libraries News51(1), 18-20.

Rais Dana, F.L. (1397). Information literacy and learning technology. The growth of educational technology. 33 (7). 8-6. (In Persian)

Shao, X., & Purpur, G. (2016). Effects of information literacy skills on student writing and course performance. The Journal of Academic Librarianship42(6), 670-678.

Siamak, M., Davarpanah, M. (2009). Construction and validation of basic and real information literacy questionnaire of undergraduate bachelor of sciences students. Library and Information Sciences, 12(1), 119-146. (In Persian).

Singh, P. K., & Singh, A. P. (2018). Assessing Subject Areas of Worldwide Information Literacy Research and Practice: A Discipline Co-Occurrence Network Analysis Approach. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-20.

Seifuri, V. (2009). Investigating the status of information literacy of final year undergraduate students of Razi University of Kermanshah. Shamseh: Electronic Journal of Libraries, Museums and Documentation Center of Astan Quds Razavi, 1 (No. 3 October and November 2009), 1-19. (In Persian).

Toudar, S. (2019). Citation Analysis of Published Scientific Production References by Faculty Members of Tonekabon Branch Islamic Azad University At ISI, ISC, and Scopus databases. Management and Educational Perspective, 1(1), 63-84. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2019.100584. (In Persian).

UNESCO. (2008). Information for all program me. Retrieved from www. UNESCO.org.

Yu, H., Abrizah, A., ERK, R., & Abdullah, S. N. M. (2018). Reinforcing information literacy development through a subject-focused resource-based project. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science50(4), 386-398.

Zahed Babelan, A., Rajabi, S. (2011). Evaluation of Information Literacy in University Students. Technology of Education, 5(4), 309-317. (In Persian).